Literature DB >> 28804400

Differential age-related changes in localizing a target among distractors across an extended visual field.

Jing Feng1, Fergus I M Craik2,3, Brian Levine2,3, Sylvain Moreno2,4,3, Gary Naglie2,5,6,7, HeeSun Choi1.   

Abstract

Age differences in the spatial distribution of attention over a wide field of view have only been described in terms of the spatial extent, leaving the topographical aspect unexplored. This study examined age differences between younger and older adults in good general health in an important topographical characteristic, the asymmetry between the upper and lower visual fields. In Experiment 1, we found age differences across the entire attentional visual field. In addition, age differences were greater in the upper compared to the lower field. In Experiment 2, we examined whether the finding of a greater age difference in the ability to localize a target among distractors in the upper visual field in Experiment 1 was a result of possible differential age differences between the upper and lower visual fields in the ability to localize a target even when there was no distractor competing for attention. Our results suggested that the age differences we observed were linked to age differences in the ability to filter out distractors that compete with the target for attention rather than the ability to process only the target over a wide field of view. While younger adults demonstrated an upper visual field advantage in the ability to localize a target among distractors, there was no such field advantage in older adults. We discuss this finding of diminished upper visual field advantage in older adults in light of an account of pervasive loss of neural specialization with age. We postulate that one possible explanation of age differences in the asymmetry between the upper and lower visual fields may be an adaptation to age-related physical decline. We also discuss important implications of our findings in risks of falls and vehicle crashes.

Keywords:  Adaptation; Aging; Asymmetry; Attentional visual field

Year:  2016        PMID: 28804400      PMCID: PMC5550660          DOI: 10.1007/s10433-016-0399-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ageing        ISSN: 1613-9372


  43 in total

1.  Tops are more salient than bottoms.

Authors:  K W Chambers; M K McBeath; D J Schiano; E G Metz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-05

2.  Effects of aging on the useful field of view.

Authors:  A B Sekuler; P J Bennett; M Mamelak
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2000 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.645

3.  Is the dissociability of working memory systems for name identity, visual-object identity, and spatial location maintained in old age?

Authors:  A A Hartley; N K Speer; J Jonides; P A Reuter-Lorenz; E E Smith
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Task coordination and aging: explorations of executive control processes in the task switching paradigm.

Authors:  A F Kramer; S Hahn; D Gopher
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1999-04

5.  Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search.

Authors:  Jason J Braithwaite; Glyn W Humphreys; Johan Hulleman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-01

6.  Age-related changes in orienting attention in time.

Authors:  Theodore P Zanto; Peter Pan; Helen Liu; Jacob Bollinger; Anna C Nobre; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Gait and balance disorders in older adults.

Authors:  Brooke Salzman
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.292

8.  Age differences in target identification as a function of retinal location and noise level: examination of the useful field of view.

Authors:  C T Scialfa; D W Kline; B J Lyman
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1987-03

9.  Cognitive and vision loss affects the topography of the attentional visual field.

Authors:  Shirin E Hassan; Kathleen A Turano; Beatriz Muñoz; Cynthia Munro; Karen Bandeen Roche; Sheila K West
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Older drivers and failure to stop at red lights.

Authors:  Sheila K West; Daniel V Hahn; Kevin C Baldwin; Donald D Duncan; Beatriz E Munoz; Kathleen A Turano; Shirin E Hassan; Cynthia A Munro; Karen Bandeen-Roche
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 6.053

View more
  2 in total

1.  Adaptive response criteria in road hazard detection among older drivers.

Authors:  Jing Feng; HeeSun Choi; Fergus I M Craik; Brian Levine; Sylvain Moreno; Gary Naglie; Motao Zhu
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 1.491

2.  Functional Field of View Determined by Crowding, Aging, or Glaucoma Under Divided Attention.

Authors:  Foroogh Shamsi; Victoria Chen; Rong Liu; Valentina Pergher; MiYoung Kwon
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.283

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.