Literature DB >> 15910310

How to use molecular marker data to measure evolutionary parameters in wild populations.

Dany Garant1, Loeske E B Kruuk.   

Abstract

Estimating the genetic basis of phenotypic traits and the selection pressures acting on them are central to our understanding of the evolution and conservation of wild populations. However, obtaining such evolutionary-related parameters is not an easy task as it requires accurate information on both relatedness among individuals and their breeding success. Polymorphic molecular markers are very useful in estimating relatedness between individuals and parentage analyses are now extensively used in most taxa. The next step in the application of molecular data to wild populations is to use them to derive estimates of evolutionary-related parameters for quantitative traits, such as quantitative genetic parameters (e.g. heritability, genetic correlations) and measures of selection (e.g. selection gradients). Despite their great appeal and potential, the optimal use of molecular tools is still debated and it remains unclear how they should best be used to obtain reliable estimates of evolutionary parameters in the wild. Here, we review the methods available for estimating quantitative genetic and selection parameters and discuss their merits and shortcomings, to provide a tool that summarizes the potential uses of molecular data to obtain such parameters in wild populations.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15910310     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02561.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  23 in total

1.  A graphical approach to relatedness inference.

Authors:  Anthony Almudevar
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Multilevel selection 1: Quantitative genetics of inheritance and response to selection.

Authors:  Piter Bijma; William M Muir; Johan A M Van Arendonk
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Robustness of linkage maps in natural populations: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jon Slate
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Wild pedigrees: the way forward.

Authors:  J M Pemberton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Pedigree-free animal models: the relatedness matrix reloaded.

Authors:  Francesca D Frentiu; Sonya M Clegg; John Chittock; Terry Burke; Mark W Blows; Ian P F Owens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data under polygamy.

Authors:  J Wang; A W Santure
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  DNA-based methods for eriophyoid mite studies: review, critical aspects, prospects and challenges.

Authors:  Maria Navajas; Denise Navia
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 2.132

Review 8.  Quantitative genetics approaches to study evolutionary processes in ecotoxicology; a perspective from research on the evolution of resistance.

Authors:  Paul L Klerks; Lingtian Xie; Jeffrey S Levinton
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  Environmental and genetic determinants of innovativeness in a natural population of birds.

Authors:  John L Quinn; Ella F Cole; Thomas E Reed; Julie Morand-Ferron
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  A core set of microsatellite loci for yellow-throated marten, Martes flavigula: a case of inferences of family relationships.

Authors:  Seon-Mi Lee; Hea Chang Moon; Hye Sook Jeon; Eui-Geun Song; Donggul Woo; Junghwa An; Mu-Yeong Lee
Journal:  Genes Genomics       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 1.839

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.