Literature DB >> 15905619

Effectiveness of screening aqueous contrast swallow in detecting clinically significant anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy.

M B Tirnaksiz1, C Deschamps, M S Allen, D C Johnson, P C Pairolero.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aqueous contrast swallow study is recommended as a screening procedure for the evaluation of esophageal anastomotic integrity following esophagectomy. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of water-soluble contrast swallow screening as a predictor of clinically significant anastomotic leak in patients with esophagectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 505 consecutive patients undergoing esophagectomy in Mayo Clinic from January 1991 through December 1995 were retrospectively reviewed. 464 (92%) patients had water-soluble contrast swallows performed in the early postoperative period (median postoperative day 7, range 4-11 days).
RESULTS: A total of 39 radiological leaks were obtained but only 17 of these had clinical signs of anastomotic leakage. Furthermore, 25 patients who had normal swallow study developed a clinical anastomotic leak. There were therefore 22 (4.7%) false positive and 25 (5.4%) false negative results giving values for the specificity, sensitivity and false negative error rate of the radiological examination of 94.7, 40.4, and 59.5% respectively. Aspiration of the contrast agent was noted on fluoroscopy in 30 (6.5%) patients. Only 2 (0.4%) patients developed aqueous contrast agent-caused aspiration pneumonia. There was no procedure-related mortality.
CONCLUSION: While radiological assessment of esophageal anastomoses in the early postoperative period using aqueous contrast agents appears to be a relatively safe procedure, the poor sensitivity and high false negative error rate of this technique, when performed on postoperative day 7 and in a series with clinical anastomotic leak rate of 9%, is insufficient for it to be worthwhile as a screening procedure. Copyright (c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15905619     DOI: 10.1159/000084544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Surg Res        ISSN: 0014-312X            Impact factor:   1.745


  21 in total

1.  Esophagogastric anastomosis with invagination into stomach: New technique to reduce fistula formation.

Authors:  Alexandre Cruz Henriques; Carlos Alberto Godinho; Roberto Saad; Daniel Reis Waisberg; Aline Biral Zanon; Manlio Basilio Speranzini; Jaques Waisberg
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  The importance of radiological controls of anastomoses after upper gastrointestinal tract surgery - a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Joerg Doerfer; Thomas Meyer; Peter Klein; Nathaniel Melling; Alexander G Kerscher; Werner Hohenberger; Joerg Ow Pelz
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2010-11-11

3.  Complete endoscopic closure of gastric defects using a full-thickness tissue plicating device.

Authors:  Michael F McGee; Jeffrey M Marks; Judy Jin; Christina Williams; Amitabh Chak; Steve J Schomisch; Jamie Andrews; Shoichi Okada; Jeffrey L Ponsky
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Routine Contrast Esophagram in Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy; Methodological Issues on Diagnostic Value: Reply.

Authors:  Zhengbin You
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  [Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage following esophageal and cardial resection : Definition and validation of a new severity grading classification].

Authors:  A Schaible; T Schmidt; M Diener; U Hinz; P Sauer; D Wichmann; A Königsrainer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  [Management of postoperative complications following esophagectomy].

Authors:  D Schubert; St Dalicho; L Flohr; F Benedix; H Lippert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  The Diagnostic Value of Routine Contrast Esophagram in Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Zhongwu Hu; Xiaowe Wang; Xush An; Wenjin Li; Yun Feng; Zhenbing You
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  An alternative postoperative pathway reduces length of hospitalisation following oesophagectomy.

Authors:  Sandra C Tomaszek; Stephen D Cassivi; Mark S Allen; K Robert Shen; Francis C Nichols; Claude Deschamps; Dennis A Wigle
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 4.191

9.  Complete endoscopic closure of gastrotomy after natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery using the NDO Plicator.

Authors:  M F McGee; J M Marks; R P Onders; A Chak; J Jin; C P Williams; S J Schomisch; J L Ponsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-09-03       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Classification and early recognition of gastric conduit failure after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Darmarajah Veeramootoo; Rajeev Parameswaran; Rakesh Krishnadas; Peter Froeschle; Martin Cooper; Richard G Berrisford; Shahjehan A Wajed
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.