Literature DB >> 21128322

Esophagogastric anastomosis with invagination into stomach: New technique to reduce fistula formation.

Alexandre Cruz Henriques1, Carlos Alberto Godinho, Roberto Saad, Daniel Reis Waisberg, Aline Biral Zanon, Manlio Basilio Speranzini, Jaques Waisberg.   

Abstract

AIM: To present a new technique of cervical esophagogastric anastomosis to reduce the frequency of fistula formation.
METHODS: A group of 31 patients with thoracic and abdominal esophageal cancer underwent cervical esophagogastric anastomosis with invagination of the proximal esophageal stump into the stomach tube. In the region elected for anastomosis, a transverse myotomy of the esophagus was carried out around the entire circumference of the esophagus. Afterwards, a 4-cm long segment of esophagus was invaginated into the stomach and anastomosed to the anterior and the posterior walls.
RESULTS: Postoperative minor complications occurred in 22 (70.9%) patients. Four (12.9%) patients had serious complications that led to death. The discharge of saliva was at a lower region, while attempting to leave the anastomosis site out of the alimentary transit. Three (9.7%) patients had fistula at the esophagogastric anastomosis, with minimal leakage of air or saliva and with mild clinical repercussions. No patients had esophagogastric fistula with intense saliva leakage from either the cervical incision or the thoracic drain. Fibrotic stenosis of anastomoses occurred in seven (22.6%) patients. All these patients obtained relief from their dysphagia with endoscopic dilatation of the anastomosis.
CONCLUSION: Cervical esophagogastric anastomosis with invagination of the proximal esophageal stump into the stomach tube presented a low rate of esophagogastric fistula with mild clinical repercussions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21128322      PMCID: PMC2997988          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i45.5722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  29 in total

1.  Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy: a prospective study of 945 patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey Rentz; David Bull; David Harpole; Stephen Bailey; Leigh Neumayer; Theodore Pappas; Barbara Krasnicka; William Henderson; Jennifer Daley; Shukri Khuri
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  A prospective randomized comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resection for lower-third esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  K M Chu; S Y Law; M Fok; J Wong
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 3.  Surgical resection for esophageal carcinoma: speaking the language.

Authors:  Robert J Korst
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Using the supercharge technique to additionally revascularize the gastric tube after a subtotal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Fuyo Yoshimi; Yuji Asato; Shigeo Ikeda; Kojun Okamoto; Yasuhiro Komuro; Johji Imura; Masayuki Itabashi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Intrathoracic manifestations of cervical anastomotic leaks after transthoracic esophagectomy for carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert J Korst; Jeffrey L Port; Paul C Lee; Nasser K Altorki
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Effectiveness of screening aqueous contrast swallow in detecting clinically significant anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy.

Authors:  M B Tirnaksiz; C Deschamps; M S Allen; D C Johnson; P C Pairolero
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.745

7.  Specialty training and mortality after esophageal cancer resection.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; Philip P Goodney; Mark B Orringer; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Subtotal esophagectomy with extended 2-field lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Ivan Stilidi; Michail Davydov; Vahan Bokhyan; Elkhan Suleymanov
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.191

9.  Benign anastomotic strictures after transhiatal esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy: risk factors and management.

Authors:  P Honkoop; P D Siersema; H W Tilanus; L P Stassen; W C Hop; M van Blankenstein
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  [Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy: outcomes].

Authors:  Renam Catharina Tinoco; Augusto Cláudio Tinoco; Luciana Janene El-Kadre; Rodrigo Amaral Rios; Daniela Mendonça Sueth; Felipe Montes Pena
Journal:  Arq Gastroenterol       Date:  2007 Apr-Jun
View more
  4 in total

1.  Where is the acid coming from? Esophago-gastric fistula following laparoscopic nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  Carlene L Chun; Gansevoort Dunnington; George Triadafilopoulos
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Vacuum sealing drainage combined with naso-intestinal and gastric decompression tubes for the treatment of esophagogastrostomy neck fistula.

Authors:  Chuan Tian; Kaihao Xu; Yanan Zhao; Yahua Li; Kunpeng Wu; Dechao Jiao; Xinwei Han
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 1.522

3.  Embedded cervical esophagogastrostomy: a simple and convenient method using a circular stapler after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinomas.

Authors:  Sen Wu; Mingyao Chen; Li Wei; Zhong Chen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Efficacy of single-layer continuous suture of the posterior wall in anastomosis involving a difficult location of the digestive tract.

Authors:  Guo-Cai Li; Yong Xu; Yu-Chun Zhang; Fang-Cheng Zhang; Qi Wang; Qing-Jiu Ma
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.967

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.