Literature DB >> 21070633

The importance of radiological controls of anastomoses after upper gastrointestinal tract surgery - a retrospective cohort study.

Joerg Doerfer1, Thomas Meyer, Peter Klein, Nathaniel Melling, Alexander G Kerscher, Werner Hohenberger, Joerg Ow Pelz.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study was designed to analyze whether routine radiological controls of anastomoses in the upper gastrointestinal tract an early detection of anastomotic leaks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 135 patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal tract surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Patients in the first group (n = 55) underwent routine radiological control of the anastomoses. In the second group (n = 80) the radiological control was only performed in case of clinical symptoms or signs of anastomotic leaks.
RESULTS: The incidence of anastomotic leaks in the patients seen by us was 5.2%, equivalent to 7 of 135 patients In Group 1 leaks were seen in 4 of 55 patients (7,2%) in group 2 leaks were seen in 3 of 80 (3,8%). The radiological control of the anastomoses with contrast swallow showed the leakage in two cases. Twice the results were false negative. The sensitivity of computed tomography was 100%. DISCUSSION: Routine radiological control of anastomoses with contrast swallow only has low sensitivity. This procedure should not be performed routinely any more.The radiological control should be used in cases with signs of anastomotic leakage or with postoperatively impaired gastrointestinal passage.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21070633      PMCID: PMC2994795          DOI: 10.1186/1754-9493-4-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Saf Surg        ISSN: 1754-9493


  27 in total

Review 1.  Complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: imaging and imaging-guided interventional procedures.

Authors:  D A Gervais; C Fernandez-del Castillo; M J O'Neill; P F Hahn; P R Mueller
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Gastrografin to evaluate postoperative patients in whom anastomotic leakage is suspected.

Authors:  A Z Ginai
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Experimental evaluation of various available contrast agents for use in the gastrointestinal tract in case of suspected leakage. Effects on peritoneum.

Authors:  A Z Ginai
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Near-total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  J A Salo; I Saario; E O Kivilaakso; M Lempinen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Anastomotic leakage, stenosis, and reflux after esophageal replacement.

Authors:  H G Borst; D Dragojevic; T Stegmann; R Hetzer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Barium swallows after free jejunal transfer: should they be performed routinely?

Authors:  P G Cordeiro; K Shah; E Santamaria; M J Gollub; B Singh; J P Shah
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Effectiveness of screening aqueous contrast swallow in detecting clinically significant anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy.

Authors:  M B Tirnaksiz; C Deschamps; M S Allen; D C Johnson; P C Pairolero
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.745

8.  Prospective study of routine contrast radiology after total gastrectomy.

Authors:  P J Lamb; S M Griffin; M V Chandrashekar; D L Richardson; D Karat; N Hayes
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Surgical treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma: impact on survival and quality of life. A prospective ten year study.

Authors:  M Braga; M Molinari; W Zuliani; L Foppa; L Gianotti; G Radaelli; M Cristallo; V Di Carlo
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb

10.  Radical pancreatectomy: postoperative evaluation by CT.

Authors:  J P Heiken; D M Balfe; D Picus; D W Scharp
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Routine fluoroscopic investigations after primary bariatric surgery].

Authors:  D Gärtner; A Ernst; K Fedtke; J Jenkner; A Schöttler; P Reimer; M Blüher; M R Schön
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Drain amylase aids detection of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Erin H Baker; Joshua S Hill; Mark K Reames; James Symanowski; Susie C Hurley; Jonathan C Salo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-04

3.  Does Routine Endoscopy or Contrast Swallow Study After Esophagectomy and Gastric Tube Reconstruction Change Patient Management?

Authors:  N Nederlof; J de Jonge; T de Vringer; T C K Tran; M C W Spaander; H W Tilanus; B P L Wijnhoven
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.452

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.