Dean F Sittig1, Michael Krall, Joann Kaalaas-Sittig, Joan S Ash. 1. Department of Medical Informatics, Northwest Permanente, P.C., Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR 97227, USA. dean.f.sittig@kp.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Computer-based provider order entry (CPOE) systems are implemented to increase both efficiency and accuracy in health care, but these systems often cause a myriad of emotions to arise. This qualitative research investigates the emotions surrounding CPOE implementation and use. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of several previously collected qualitative data sets from interviews and observations of over 50 individuals. Three researchers worked in parallel to identify themes that expressed emotional responses to CPOE. We then reviewed and classified these quotes using a validated hierarchical taxonomy of semantically homogeneous terms associated with specific emotions. RESULTS: The implementation and use of CPOE systems provoked examples of positive, negative, and neutral emotions. Negative emotional responses were the most prevalent, by far, in all the observations. CONCLUSION: Designing and implementing CPOE systems is difficult. These systems and the implementation process itself often inspire intense emotions. If designers and implementers fail to recognize that various CPOE features and implementation strategies can increase clinicians' negative emotions, then the systems may fail to become a routine part of the clinical care delivery process. We might alleviate some of these problems by designing positive feedback mechanisms for both the systems and the organizations.
OBJECTIVES: Computer-based provider order entry (CPOE) systems are implemented to increase both efficiency and accuracy in health care, but these systems often cause a myriad of emotions to arise. This qualitative research investigates the emotions surrounding CPOE implementation and use. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of several previously collected qualitative data sets from interviews and observations of over 50 individuals. Three researchers worked in parallel to identify themes that expressed emotional responses to CPOE. We then reviewed and classified these quotes using a validated hierarchical taxonomy of semantically homogeneous terms associated with specific emotions. RESULTS: The implementation and use of CPOE systems provoked examples of positive, negative, and neutral emotions. Negative emotional responses were the most prevalent, by far, in all the observations. CONCLUSION: Designing and implementing CPOE systems is difficult. These systems and the implementation process itself often inspire intense emotions. If designers and implementers fail to recognize that various CPOE features and implementation strategies can increase clinicians' negative emotions, then the systems may fail to become a routine part of the clinical care delivery process. We might alleviate some of these problems by designing positive feedback mechanisms for both the systems and the organizations.
Authors: J Marc Overhage; Blackford Middleton; Randolph A Miller; Rita D Zielstorff; William R Hersh Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2002 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Joan S Ash; Paul N Gorman; Mary Lavelle; Thomas H Payne; Thomas A Massaro; Gerri L Frantz; Jason A Lyman Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2003 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Tosha B Wetterneck; Mark Linzer; Julia E McMurray; Jeffrey Douglas; Mark D Schwartz; JudyAnn Bigby; Martha S Gerrity; Donald E Pathman; David Karlson; Elnora Rhodes Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2002-03-25
Authors: Ross Koppel; Joshua P Metlay; Abigail Cohen; Brian Abaluck; A Russell Localio; Stephen E Kimmel; Brian L Strom Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-03-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Klara K Papp; Eleanor P Stoller; Paulette Sage; James E Aikens; Judith Owens; Alon Avidan; Barbara Phillips; Raymond Rosen; Kingman P Strohl Journal: Acad Med Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Joshua E Richardson; Sina Shah-Hosseini; John E Fiadjoe; Joan S Ash; Mohamed A Rehman Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2010-11-27 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Emily M Campbell; Dean F Sittig; Joan S Ash; Kenneth P Guappone; Richard H Dykstra Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2006-06-23 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Yu Ko; Jacob Abarca; Daniel C Malone; Donna C Dare; Doug Geraets; Antoun Houranieh; William N Jones; W Paul Nichol; Gregory P Schepers; Michelle Wilhardt Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2006-10-26 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Joan S Ash; Dean F Sittig; Eric G Poon; Kenneth Guappone; Emily Campbell; Richard H Dykstra Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2007-04-25 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: L Grabenbauer; R Fraser; J McClay; N Woelfl; C B Thompson; J Cambell; J Windle Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 2.342