Literature DB >> 20593237

Satisfaction predictors and attitudes towards electronic prescribing systems in three UK hospitals.

Derar H Abdel-Qader1, Judith A Cantrill, Mary P Tully.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Measuring satisfaction of technology users, along with satisfaction determinants, is important to enhance system utilisation and identify potential problems. The aim of this study was to investigate pharmacists' and doctors' attitudes towards e-prescribing systems, and assess the predictors of their satisfaction.
METHOD: A cross-sectional survey was conducted, with 67 pharmacists and 335 doctors in three English hospitals completing a pre-piloted, postal questionnaire.
RESULTS: The majority of pharmacists and doctors agreed that their e-prescribing system improved the efficiency of prescribing, and reduced dosage regimen errors. However, the majority did not believe that the system created more time for near-patient clinical activities, or sped up patient discharge. More pharmacists than doctors believed that the system improved the quality of patient care. Doctors were more likely to perceive that the e-prescribing system reduced formulation and omission errors. Doctors and pharmacists from the same hospital had similar opinions about the strengths and weaknesses of the e-prescribing system. Nine variables (out of 29 potential independent variables), seven of which were related to e-prescribing system efficiency, were significant predictors of user satisfaction.
CONCLUSION: Overall, respondents were satisfied with the systems; however, pharmacists were generally more satisfied than doctors. The number of satisfaction predictors related to the feelings about e-prescribing system efficiency was larger than those predictors related to the quality of patient care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: These findings contribute to better understanding of how pharmacists and doctors perceive e-prescribing systems, and also have implications for system development, training, and how an e-prescribing system can be most effectively 'marketed' to different user groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20593237     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-010-9411-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm World Sci        ISSN: 0928-1231


  27 in total

1.  Emotional aspects of computer-based provider order entry: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Dean F Sittig; Michael Krall; Joann Kaalaas-Sittig; Joan S Ash
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Community hospital physician adoption of a CPOE system: perceptions of readiness, usefulness, and satisfaction.

Authors:  Rita Snyder; Willa Fields
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

3.  Physician characteristics, attitudes, and use of computerized order entry.

Authors:  Peter K Lindenauer; David Ling; Penelope S Pekow; Allison Crawford; Deborah Naglieri-Prescod; Nancy Hoople; Janice Fitzgerald; Evan M Benjamin
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.960

Review 4.  Computer-based physician order entry: the state of the art.

Authors:  D F Sittig; W W Stead
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: II. Impact on medical education.

Authors:  T A Massaro
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Medical students' and housestaff's opinions of computerized order-writing.

Authors:  W M Tierney; J M Overhage; C J McDonald; F D Wolinsky
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Impact of computerized physician order entry on physician time.

Authors:  D W Bates; D L Boyle; J M Teich
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1994

8.  Dissemination of computer skills among physicians: the infectious process model.

Authors:  F B Quinn; J A Hokanson; M M McCracken; C M Stiernberg
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Contrasting views of physicians and nurses about an inpatient computer-based provider order-entry system.

Authors:  M Weiner; T Gress; D R Thiemann; M Jenckes; S L Reel; S F Mandell; E B Bass
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research.

Authors:  M E Johnston; K B Langton; R B Haynes; A Mathieu
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  E-prescribing: a focused review and new approach to addressing safety in pharmacies and primary care.

Authors:  Olufunmilola K Odukoya; Michelle A Chui
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2012-10-11

2.  Evaluation of Transition to Electronic Prescriptions in Turkey: Perspective of Family Physicians.

Authors:  Sinan Bulut; Ahmet Yıldız; Sıdıka Kaya
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2019-01-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.