Literature DB >> 12463855

Clinician's assessments of outpatient electronic medical record alert and reminder usability and usefulness requirements.

Michael A Krall1, Dean F Sittig.   

Abstract

Electronic medical record alerts and reminders are increasingly employed as a means of decreasing medical errors and increasing the quality and cost-effectiveness of care. However, clinicians indicate that alerts and reminders can be either help or hindrance. Discerning the elements that determine which they will be, and the requirements of a helpful alert or reminder, was the focus of this study. We convened three focus groups, comprised of a total of 16 participants. During analysis, five themes emerged: Efficiency, Usefulness, Information Content, User Interface, and Workflow. In addition there were some New Ideas and Surprises. Specific usability and usefulness requirements emerged from within the themes and these are described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12463855      PMCID: PMC2244227     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN: 1531-605X


  1 in total

1.  Subjective assessment of usefulness and appropriate presentation mode of alerts and reminders in the outpatient setting.

Authors:  M A Krall; D F Sittig
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001
  1 in total
  37 in total

Review 1.  Changing clinical practice through patient specific reminders available at the time of the clinical encounter: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tim A Holt; Margaret Thorogood; Frances Griffiths
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Computer alerts for potassium testing: resisting the temptation of a blanket approach.

Authors:  Ashish Atreja; Neil Mehta; Anil Jain; C Martin Harris
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  A successful model and visual design for creating context-aware drug-drug interaction alerts.

Authors:  Jon D Duke; Davide Bolchini
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

4.  Primary Care Physician Designation and Response to Clinical Decision Support Reminders: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Weinfeld; Paul N Gorman
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  Emotional aspects of computer-based provider order entry: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Dean F Sittig; Michael Krall; Joann Kaalaas-Sittig; Joan S Ash
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Overriding of drug safety alerts in computerized physician order entry.

Authors:  Heleen van der Sijs; Jos Aarts; Arnold Vulto; Marc Berg
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Relationship of estimated resolution time and computerized clinical reminder adherence.

Authors:  Sze-Jung Wu; Mark Lehto; Yuehwern Yih; Jason J Saleem; Bradley N Doebbeling
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

Review 8.  Computerized clinical decision support for prescribing: provision does not guarantee uptake.

Authors:  Annette Moxey; Jane Robertson; David Newby; Isla Hains; Margaret Williamson; Sallie-Anne Pearson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Turning off frequently overridden drug alerts: limited opportunities for doing it safely.

Authors:  Heleen van der Sijs; Jos Aarts; Teun van Gelder; Marc Berg; Arnold Vulto
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  An electronic prompt in dispensing software to promote clinical interventions by community pharmacists: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  James F Reeve; Peter C Tenni; Gregory M Peterson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.