Literature DB >> 15903117

Exploring the role of lexical stress in lexical recognition.

Wilma van Donselaar1, Mariëtte Koster, Anne Cutler.   

Abstract

Three cross-modal priming experiments examined the role of suprasegmental information in the processing of spoken words. All primes consisted of truncated spoken Dutch words. Recognition of visually presented word targets was facilitated by prior auditory presentation of the first two syllables of the same words as primes, but only if they were appropriately stressed (e.g., OKTOBER preceded by okTO-); inappropriate stress, compatible with another word (e.g., OKTOBER preceded by OCto-, the beginning of octopus), produced inhibition. Monosyllabic fragments (e.g., OC-) also produced facilitation when appropriately stressed; if inappropriately stressed, they produced neither facilitation nor inhibition. The bisyllabic fragments that were compatible with only one word produced facilitation to semantically associated words, but inappropriate stress caused no inhibition of associates. The results are explained within a model of spoken-word recognition involving competition between simultaneously activated phonological representations followed by activation of separate conceptual representations for strongly supported lexical candidates; at the level of the phonological representations, activation is modulated by both segmental and suprasegmental information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15903117     DOI: 10.1080/02724980343000927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  12 in total

1.  Effects of lexical prosody and word familiarity on lexical access of spoken Japanese words.

Authors:  Takahiro Sekiguchi
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2006-07

2.  Syllabic effects in Italian lexical access.

Authors:  Lara Tagliapietra; R Fanari; S Collina; P Tabossi
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2009-04-28

3.  Cross-language differences in cue use for speech segmentation.

Authors:  Michael D Tyler; Anne Cutler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  English Listeners Use Suprasegmental Cues to Lexical Stress Early During Spoken-Word Recognition.

Authors:  Alexandra Jesse; Katja Poellmann; Ying-Yee Kong
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Low-frequency fine-structure cues allow for the online use of lexical stress during spoken-word recognition in spectrally degraded speech.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Alexandra Jesse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Recognition memory for foreign language lexical stress.

Authors:  Lidia Suárez; Winston D Goh
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-08

7.  Metrical expectations from preceding prosody influence perception of lexical stress.

Authors:  Meredith Brown; Anne Pier Salverda; Laura C Dilley; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Strategic perceptual weighting of acoustic cues for word stress in listeners with cochlear implants, acoustic hearing, or simulated bimodal hearing.

Authors:  Justin T Fleming; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.482

9.  Neuro-cognitive foundations of word stress processing - evidence from fMRI.

Authors:  Elise Klein; Ulrike Domahs; Marion Grande; Frank Domahs
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.759

10.  Sensitivity to the acoustic correlates of lexical stress and their relationship to reading in skilled readers.

Authors:  Gareth J Williams; Clare Wood
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2012-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.