Literature DB >> 15901698

Novel molecular features of the fibrolytic intestinal bacterium Fibrobacter intestinalis not shared with Fibrobacter succinogenes as determined by suppressive subtractive hybridization.

Meng Qi1, Karen E Nelson, Sean C Daugherty, William C Nelson, Ioana R Hance, Mark Morrison, Cecil W Forsberg.   

Abstract

Suppressive subtractive hybridization was conducted to identify unique genes coding for plant cell wall hydrolytic enzymes and other properties of the gastrointestinal bacterium Fibrobacter intestinalis DR7 not shared by Fibrobacter succinogenes S85. Subtractive clones from F. intestinalis were sequenced and assembled to form 712 nonredundant contigs with an average length of 525 bp. Of these, 55 sequences were unique to F. intestinalis. The remaining contigs contained 764 genes with BLASTX similarities to other proteins; of these, 80% had the highest similarities to proteins in F. succinogenes, including 30 that coded for carbohydrate active enzymes. The expression of 17 of these genes was verified by Northern dot blot analysis. Of genes not exhibiting BLASTX similarity to F. succinogenes, 30 encoded putative transposases, 6 encoded restriction modification genes, and 45% had highest similarities to proteins in other species of gastrointestinal bacteria, a finding suggestive of either horizontal gene transfer to F. intestinalis or gene loss from F. succinogenes. Analysis of contigs containing segments of two or more adjacent genes revealed that only 35% exhibited BLASTX similarity and were in the same orientation as those of F. succinogenes, indicating extensive chromosomal rearrangement. The expression of eight transposases, and three restriction-modification genes was confirmed by Northern dot blot analysis. These data clearly document the maintenance of carbohydrate active enzymes in F. intestinalis necessitated by the preponderance of polysaccharide substrates available in the ruminal environment. It also documents substantive changes in the genome from that of F. succinogenes, which may be related to the introduction of the array of transposase and restriction-modification genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15901698      PMCID: PMC1112041          DOI: 10.1128/JB.187.11.3739-3751.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  36 in total

1.  REBASE--restriction enzymes and methylases.

Authors:  R J Roberts; D Macelis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Horizontal gene transfer of glycosyl hydrolases of the rumen fungi.

Authors:  S Garcia-Vallvé; A Romeu; J Palau
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 3.  Behavior of restriction-modification systems as selfish mobile elements and their impact on genome evolution.

Authors:  I Kobayashi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Genome sequence of the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum.

Authors:  M Salanoubat; S Genin; F Artiguenave; J Gouzy; S Mangenot; M Arlat; A Billault; P Brottier; J C Camus; L Cattolico; M Chandler; N Choisne; C Claudel-Renard; S Cunnac; N Demange; C Gaspin; M Lavie; A Moisan; C Robert; W Saurin; T Schiex; P Siguier; P Thébault; M Whalen; P Wincker; M Levy; J Weissenbach; C A Boucher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Experimental genome evolution: large-scale genome rearrangements associated with resistance to replacement of a chromosomal restriction-modification gene complex.

Authors:  N Handa; Y Nakayama; M Sadykov; I Kobayashi
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 6.  Structure, function, and evolution of phosphoglycerate mutases: comparison with fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase, acid phosphatase, and alkaline phosphatase.

Authors:  M J Jedrzejas
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.667

7.  Comparison of microbial populations in model and natural rumens using 16S ribosomal RNA-targeted probes.

Authors:  C J Ziemer; R Sharp; M D Stern; M A Cotta; T R Whitehead; D A Stahl
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.491

8.  The Pseudomonas cellulosa glycoside hydrolase family 51 arabinofuranosidase exhibits wide substrate specificity.

Authors:  M H Beylot; V A McKie; A G Voragen; C H Doeswijk-Voragen; H J Gilbert
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 3.857

9.  VITAMIN REQUIREMENTS OF SEVERAL CELLULOLYTIC RUMEN BACTERIA.

Authors:  H W SCOTT; B A DEHORITY
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1965-05       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 10.  Evaluating genome dynamics: the constraints on rearrangements within bacterial genomes.

Authors:  D Hughes
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2000-12-08       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  23 in total

1.  Assessment of the genetic diversity of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli and Xanthomonas fuscans subsp. fuscans as a basis to identify putative pathogenicity genes and a type III secretion system of the SPI-1 family by multiple suppression subtractive hybridizations.

Authors:  Seyed Mehdi Alavi; Saeideh Sanjari; Fabien Durand; Chrystelle Brin; Charles Manceau; Stéphane Poussier
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Production of indole from L-tryptophan and effects of these compounds on biofilm formation by Fusobacterium nucleatum ATCC 25586.

Authors:  Takako Sasaki-Imamura; Akira Yano; Yasuo Yoshida
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  The Fibrobacteres: an important phylum of cellulose-degrading bacteria.

Authors:  Emma Ransom-Jones; David L Jones; Alan J McCarthy; James E McDonald
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Effect of Antibiotic Treatment on the Gastrointestinal Microbiome of Free-Ranging Western Lowland Gorillas (Gorilla g. gorilla).

Authors:  Klára Vlčková; Andres Gomez; Klára J Petrželková; Christopher A Whittier; Angelique F Todd; Carl J Yeoman; Karen E Nelson; Brenda A Wilson; Rebecca M Stumpf; David Modrý; Bryan A White; Steven R Leigh
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Genomic differences between Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 and Fibrobacter intestinalis DR7, identified by suppression subtractive hybridization.

Authors:  M Qi; K E Nelson; S C Daugherty; W C Nelson; I R Hance; M Morrison; C W Forsberg
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  In planta gene expression analysis of Xanthomonas oryzae pathovar oryzae, African strain MAI1.

Authors:  Mauricio Soto-Suárez; Diana Bernal; Carolina González; Boris Szurek; Romain Guyot; Joe Tohme; Valérie Verdier
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.605

7.  Characterization and synergistic interactions of Fibrobacter succinogenes glycoside hydrolases.

Authors:  Meng Qi; Hyun-Sik Jun; Cecil W Forsberg
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Outer membrane proteins of Fibrobacter succinogenes with potential roles in adhesion to cellulose and in cellulose digestion.

Authors:  Hyun-Sik Jun; Meng Qi; Joshua Gong; Emmanuel E Egbosimba; Cecil W Forsberg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Isolation and identification of cellulose-binding proteins from sheep rumen contents.

Authors:  Atsushi Toyoda; Wataru Iio; Makoto Mitsumori; Hajime Minato
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Early-Life Intervention Using Exogenous Fecal Microbiota Alleviates Gut Injury and Reduce Inflammation Caused by Weaning Stress in Piglets.

Authors:  Xin Ma; Yuchen Zhang; Tingting Xu; Mengqi Qian; Zhiren Yang; Xiuan Zhan; Xinyan Han
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.