Literature DB >> 11214796

Comparison of microbial populations in model and natural rumens using 16S ribosomal RNA-targeted probes.

C J Ziemer1, R Sharp, M D Stern, M A Cotta, T R Whitehead, D A Stahl.   

Abstract

A model rumen system, dual-flow continuous culture fermenters, was evaluated by two comparative criteria in two experiments using ribosomal (r)RNA-targeted DNA probes to compare key microbial groups in samples. The initial experiment measured temporal changes in population structure during adaptation of ruminal microbial populations in fermenters over 240 h. The fermenter inoculum contained 34.9% Bacteria, 60.1% Eukarya and 6.8% Archaea measured as a fraction of total small subunit (SSU) rRNA quantified using a universal probe. The cellulolytic bacterial genus Fibrobacter comprised 9.5% of total SSU rRNA in the inoculum. After 240 h of fermenter operation, the average abundance was 80.9% Bacteria, 6.1% Eukarya, 5.1% Archaea and Fibrobacter genus accounted for 6.6% of the total SSU rRNA. Divergence between ruminal and fermenter population structure was evaluated in the second experiment and samples were classified as ruminal, inoculum or fermenter (96, 120, 144 and 168 h of fermenter operation). Fermenter samples had higher relative abundances of Bacteria (84.5%) and Archaea (2.1%) and lower relative abundances of Eukarya (1.8%) than ruminal samples (average 48.0% Bacteria, 1.3% Archaea and 61.5% Eukarya). The relative abundance of Fibrobacter was similar in all samples, averaging 2.5%. The ruminal and fermenter samples had similar proportions of F. succinogenes and F. succinogenes subgroup 3 (as a percentage of Fibrobacter SSU rRNA). Fibrobacter succinogenes subgroup 1 and F. intestinalis proportions of Fibrobacter were lower in fermenter samples (8.2% and 0.7% respectively) than in ruminal samples (28.4% and 2.2% respectively). Fermenters were able to maintain a core prokaryotic community structure similar to the native microbial community in the rumen. Although protozoa populations were lost, maintenance of Fibrobacter and archaeal populations indicated that the model system supported a functional community structure similar to the rumen. This model rumen system may serve as a suitable tool for studying aspects of ruminal microbial ecology and may resolve some of the relationships between microbial community structure and function by providing control of experimental conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11214796     DOI: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2000.00146.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 1462-2912            Impact factor:   5.491


  15 in total

Review 1.  The use of molecular techniques based on ribosomal RNA and DNA for rumen microbial ecosystem studies: a review.

Authors:  Weidong Deng; Dongmei Xi; Huaming Mao; Metha Wanapat
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Gene-centric metagenomics of the fiber-adherent bovine rumen microbiome reveals forage specific glycoside hydrolases.

Authors:  Jennifer M Brulc; Dionysios A Antonopoulos; Margret E Berg Miller; Melissa K Wilson; Anthony C Yannarell; Elizabeth A Dinsdale; Robert E Edwards; Edward D Frank; Joanne B Emerson; Pirjo Wacklin; Pedro M Coutinho; Bernard Henrissat; Karen E Nelson; Bryan A White
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Ecological and physiological characterization shows that Fibrobacter succinogenes is important in rumen fiber digestion - review.

Authors:  Y Kobayashi; T Shinkai; S Koike
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 2.099

Review 4.  Structure of the archaeal community of the rumen.

Authors:  Peter H Janssen; Marek Kirs
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Microbial fuel cells and microbial ecology: applications in ruminant health and production research.

Authors:  Orianna Bretschger; Jason B Osterstock; William E Pinchak; Shun'ichi Ishii; Karen E Nelson
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Comparisons of bacterial and archaeal communities in the rumen and a dual-flow continuous culture fermentation system using amplicon sequencing.

Authors:  I J Salfer; C Staley; H E Johnson; M J Sadowsky; M D Stern
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Quantitative qPCR Analysis of Ruminal Microorganisms in Beef Cattle Grazing in Pastures in the Rainy Season and Supplemented with Different Protein Levels.

Authors:  Renata Pereira da Silva-Marques; Joanis Tilemahos Zervoudakis; Luciano Nakazato; Luciano da Silva Cabral; Luciana Keiko Hatamoto-Zervoudakis; Maria Isabel Leite da Silva; Núbia Bezerra do Nascimento Matos; Letícia Camara Pitchenin
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.188

8.  Novel molecular features of the fibrolytic intestinal bacterium Fibrobacter intestinalis not shared with Fibrobacter succinogenes as determined by suppressive subtractive hybridization.

Authors:  Meng Qi; Karen E Nelson; Sean C Daugherty; William C Nelson; Ioana R Hance; Mark Morrison; Cecil W Forsberg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Methane Reduction Potential of Brown Seaweeds and Their Influence on Nutrient Degradation and Microbiota Composition in a Rumen Simulation Technique.

Authors:  Susanne Künzel; Timur Yergaliyev; Katharina J Wild; Hanna Philippi; Asta H Petursdottir; Helga Gunnlaugsdottir; Chris K Reynolds; David J Humphries; Amélia Camarinha-Silva; Markus Rodehutscord
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 6.064

10.  Characterization and synergistic interactions of Fibrobacter succinogenes glycoside hydrolases.

Authors:  Meng Qi; Hyun-Sik Jun; Cecil W Forsberg
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.