Literature DB >> 15898661

Perception of aperiodicity in pathological voice.

Jody Kreiman1, Bruce R Gerratt.   

Abstract

Although jitter, shimmer, and noise acoustically characterize all voice signals, their perceptual importance in naturally produced pathological voices has not been established psychoacoustically. To determine the role of these attributes in the perception of vocal quality, listeners were asked to adjust levels of jitter, shimmer, and the noise-to-signal ratio in a speech synthesizer, so that synthetic voices matched naturally produced tokens. Results showed that, although listeners agreed well in their judgments of the noise-to-signal ratio, they did not agree with one another in their chosen settings for jitter and shimmer. Noise-dependent differences in listeners' ability to detect changes in amounts of jitter and shimmer implicate both listener insensitivity and inability to isolate jitter and shimmer as separate dimensions in the overall pattern of aperiodicity in a voice as causes of this poor agreement. These results suggest that jitter and shimmer are not useful as independent indices of perceived vocal quality, apart from their acoustic contributions to the overall pattern of spectrally shaped noise in a voice.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15898661     DOI: 10.1121/1.1858351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Developing a single comparison stimulus for matching breathy voice quality.

Authors:  Sona Patel; Rahul Shrivastav; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Perceptual interaction of the harmonic source and noise in voice.

Authors:  Jody Kreiman; Bruce R Gerratt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perceptual sensitivity to first harmonic amplitude in the voice source.

Authors:  Jody Kreiman; Bruce R Gerratt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Listener effort for highly intelligible tracheoesophageal speech.

Authors:  Kathy F Nagle; Tanya L Eadie
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.288

5.  Structural sensing of interior sound for active control of noise in structural-acoustic cavities.

Authors:  Ashok K Bagha; S V Modak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Perceptual evaluation of voice source models.

Authors:  Jody Kreiman; Marc Garellek; Gang Chen; Abeer Alwan; Bruce R Gerratt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Voice quality and tone identification in White Hmong.

Authors:  Marc Garellek; Patricia Keating; Christina M Esposito; Jody Kreiman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  A study of sounds produced by Algerian esophageal speakers.

Authors:  K Ferrat; M Guerti
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.927

9.  Modeling the voice source in terms of spectral slopes.

Authors:  Marc Garellek; Robin Samlan; Bruce R Gerratt; Jody Kreiman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Perceptual distances of breathy voice quality: a comparison of psychophysical methods.

Authors:  Sona Patel; Rahul Shrivastav; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 2.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.