Literature DB >> 26233000

Perceptual evaluation of voice source models.

Jody Kreiman1, Marc Garellek2, Gang Chen3, Abeer Alwan3, Bruce R Gerratt1.   

Abstract

Models of the voice source differ in their fits to natural voices, but it is unclear which differences in fit are perceptually salient. This study examined the relationship between the fit of five voice source models to 40 natural voices, and the degree of perceptual match among stimuli synthesized with each of the modeled sources. Listeners completed a visual sort-and-rate task to compare versions of each voice created with the different source models, and the results were analyzed using multidimensional scaling. Neither fits to pulse shapes nor fits to landmark points on the pulses predicted observed differences in quality. Further, the source models fit the opening phase of the glottal pulses better than they fit the closing phase, but at the same time similarity in quality was better predicted by the timing and amplitude of the negative peak of the flow derivative (part of the closing phase) than by the timing and/or amplitude of peak glottal opening. Results indicate that simply knowing how (or how well) a particular source model fits or does not fit a target source pulse in the time domain provides little insight into what aspects of the voice source are important to listeners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26233000      PMCID: PMC4491021          DOI: 10.1121/1.4922174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Perception of aperiodicity in pathological voice.

Authors:  Jody Kreiman; Bruce R Gerratt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Measures of the glottal source spectrum.

Authors:  Jody Kreiman; Bruce R Gerratt; Norma Antoñanzas-Barroso
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  When and why listeners disagree in voice quality assessment tasks.

Authors:  Jody Kreiman; Bruce R Gerratt; Mika Ito
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers.

Authors:  D H Klatt; L C Klatt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Glottal characteristics of female speakers: acoustic correlates.

Authors:  H M Hanson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effect of glottal pulse shape on the quality of natural vowels.

Authors:  A E Rosenberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Digital inverse filtering for linguistic research.

Authors:  H R Javkin; N Antoñanzas-Barroso; I Maddieson
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1987-03

8.  A cepstrum-based technique for determining a harmonics-to-noise ratio in speech signals.

Authors:  G de Krom
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-04

9.  Integrated software for analysis and synthesis of voice quality.

Authors:  Jody Kreiman; Norma Antoñanzas-Barroso; Bruce R Gerratt
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-11

10.  Toward a unified theory of voice production and perception.

Authors:  Jody Kreiman; Bruce R Gerratt; Marc Garellek; Robin Samlan; Zhaoyan Zhang
Journal:  Loquens       Date:  2014-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Mechanics of human voice production and control.

Authors:  Zhaoyan Zhang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comparing Measures of Voice Quality From Sustained Phonation and Continuous Speech.

Authors:  Bruce R Gerratt; Jody Kreiman; Marc Garellek
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  The Effect of Visual Sort and Rate Versus Visual Analog Scales on the Reliability of Judgments of Dysphonia.

Authors:  Mara R Kapsner-Smith; Amanda Opuszynski; Cara E Stepp; Tanya L Eadie
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.297

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.