Literature DB >> 15896556

Symptom validity assessment: practice issues and medical necessity NAN policy & planning committee.

Shane S Bush1, Ronald M Ruff, Alexander I Tröster, Jeffrey T Barth, Sandra P Koffler, Neil H Pliskin, Cecil R Reynolds, Cheryl H Silver.   

Abstract

Symptom exaggeration or fabrication occurs in a sizeable minority of neuropsychological examinees, with greater prevalence in forensic contexts. Adequate assessment of response validity is essential in order to maximize confidence in the results of neurocognitive and personality measures and in the diagnoses and recommendations that are based on the results. Symptom validity assessment may include specific tests, indices, and observations. The manner in which symptom validity is assessed may vary depending on context but must include a thorough examination of cultural factors. Assessment of response validity, as a component of a medically necessary evaluation, is medically necessary. When determined by the neuropsychologist to be necessary for the assessment of response validity, administration of specific symptom validity tests are also medically necessary.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15896556     DOI: 10.1016/j.acn.2005.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0887-6177            Impact factor:   2.813


  28 in total

1.  [Negative response bias and the validity of personality profiles in neuropsychiatric assessment].

Authors:  T Merten; E Friedel; G Mehren; A Stevens
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Cognitive profiles and heritability estimates in the Old Order Amish.

Authors:  Ryan M Kuehner; Peter Kochunov; Katie L Nugent; Deanna E Jurius; Anya Savransky; Christopher Gaudiot; Heather A Bruce; James Gold; Alan R Shuldiner; Braxton D Mitchell; L Elliot Hong
Journal:  Psychiatr Genet       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.458

3.  RBANS Validity Indices: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Robert D Shura; Timothy W Brearly; Jared A Rowland; Sarah L Martindale; Holly M Miskey; Kevin Duff
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 7.444

4.  Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices: joint position paper of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology and the National Academy of Neuropsychology.

Authors:  Russell M Bauer; Grant L Iverson; Alison N Cernich; Laurence M Binder; Ronald M Ruff; Richard I Naugle
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.813

Review 5.  Test validity and performance validity: considerations in providing a framework for development of an ability-focused neuropsychological test battery.

Authors:  Glenn J Larrabee
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 2.813

6.  The dangers of failing one or more performance validity tests in individuals claiming mild traumatic brain injury-related postconcussive symptoms.

Authors:  Daniel A Proto; Nicholas J Pastorek; Brian I Miller; Jennifer M Romesser; Anita H Sim; John F Linck
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.813

7.  Comparison of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status effort scale and effort index in a dementia sample.

Authors:  Kathryn J Dunham; Sarah Shadi; Channing A Sofko; Robert L Denney; Jordan Calloway
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.813

8.  False-Positive Error Rates for Reliable Digit Span and Auditory Verbal Learning Test Performance Validity Measures in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Early Alzheimer Disease.

Authors:  David W Loring; Felicia C Goldstein; Chuqing Chen; Daniel L Drane; James J Lah; Liping Zhao; Glenn J Larrabee
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 2.813

9.  Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices: joint position paper of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology and the National Academy of Neuropsychology.

Authors:  Russell M Bauer; Grant L Iverson; Alison N Cernich; Laurence M Binder; Ronald M Ruff; Richard I Naugle
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.535

10.  Prevalence of below-criterion Reliable Digit Span scores in a clinical sample of older adults.

Authors:  RyAnna Zenisek; Scott R Millis; Sarah J Banks; Justin B Miller
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.