Literature DB >> 25252598

The dangers of failing one or more performance validity tests in individuals claiming mild traumatic brain injury-related postconcussive symptoms.

Daniel A Proto1, Nicholas J Pastorek2, Brian I Miller1, Jennifer M Romesser3, Anita H Sim4, John F Linck5.   

Abstract

Evaluating performance validity is important in any neuropsychological assessment, and prior research recommends a threshold for invalid performance of two or more performance validity test (PVT) failures. However, extant findings also indicate that failing a single PVT is associated with significant changes in neuropsychological performance. The current study sought to determine if there is an appreciable difference in neuropsychological testing results between individuals failing different numbers of PVTs. In a sample of veterans with reported histories of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI; N =178), analyses revealed that individuals failing only one PVT performed significantly worse than individuals failing no PVTs on measures of verbal learning and memory, processing speed, and cognitive flexibility. Additionally, individuals failing one versus two PVTs significantly differed only on delayed free recall scores. The current findings suggest that failure of even one PVT should elicit consideration of performance invalidity, particularly in individuals with histories of mTBI. Published by Oxford University Press 2014. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Effort; Mild TBI; Neuropsychological assessment; Performance validity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25252598      PMCID: PMC4263926          DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acu044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0887-6177            Impact factor:   2.813


  38 in total

1.  The effects of two motivational manipulations on the neuropsychological performance of mildly head-injured college students.

Authors:  S A Orey; D E Cragar; D T Berry
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.813

2.  Validation of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status--effort index in a veteran sample.

Authors:  J Christopher Young; Brandon C Baughman; Brad L Roper
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.535

3.  Aggregation across multiple indicators improves the detection of malingering: relationship to likelihood ratios.

Authors:  Glenn J Larrabee
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 4.  The Veterans Health Administration's (VHA's) Polytrauma System of Care for mild traumatic brain injury: costs, benefits, and controversies.

Authors:  Heather G Belanger; Jay M Uomoto; Rodney D Vanderploeg
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.710

5.  Symptom validity test performance in U.S. veterans referred for evaluation of mild TBI.

Authors:  Patrick Armistead-Jehle
Journal:  Appl Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-01

6.  Validation of the MMPI-2 Response Bias Scale and Henry-Heilbronner Index in a U.S. veteran population.

Authors:  J Christopher Young; Lee A Kearns; Brad L Roper
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.813

7.  Effort has a greater effect on test scores than severe brain injury in compensation claimants.

Authors:  P Green; M L Rohling; P R Lees-Haley; L M Allen
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Examination of performance validity test failure in relation to number of tests administered.

Authors:  Jeremy J Davis; Scott R Millis
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.535

9.  Interpreting the meaning of multiple symptom validity test failure.

Authors:  Tara L Victor; Kyle B Boone; J Greg Serpa; Jody Buehler; Elizabeth A Ziegler
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 10.  The assessment of performance and self-report validity in persons claiming pain-related disability.

Authors:  Kevin W Greve; Kevin J Bianchini; Steve T Brewer
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 3.535

View more
  2 in total

1.  Montreal Cognitive Assessment as a screening tool: Influence of performance and symptom validity.

Authors:  Brigid Waldron-Perrine; Nicolette M Gabel; Katharine Seagly; A Zarina Kraal; Percival Pangilinan; Robert J Spencer; Linas Bieliauskas
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2019-04

2.  The Dyad-Adaptive Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (DA-PASAT): Normative data and the effects of repeated testing, simulated malingering, and traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  David L Woods; John M Wyma; Timothy J Herron; E William Yund; Bruce Reed
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.