Literature DB >> 25236719

Comparison of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status effort scale and effort index in a dementia sample.

Kathryn J Dunham1, Sarah Shadi2, Channing A Sofko3, Robert L Denney2, Jordan Calloway2.   

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to compare two embedded measures of effort for the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS). Sensitivity and specificity of the Effort Index (EI) and Effort Scale (ES) were compared in a sample of individuals with genuine memory impairment (MI) and individuals coached to simulate MI. Overall, the EI yielded a sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 0.41, while the ES yielded a sensitivity of 0.88 and specificity of 0.81. When those in the MI group were separated by level of impairment, the EI was more specific when RBANS Total Scores were in the average or mildly impaired range, and the ES had greater specificity when RBANS Total Scores were in the severely impaired range. These results suggest that the embedded measure should be selected based on the level of impairment on the RBANS.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive impairment; Geriatric assessment; Malingering/symptom validity testing; RBANS

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25236719      PMCID: PMC4263924          DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acu042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0887-6177            Impact factor:   2.813


  21 in total

1.  Sensitivity and specificity of WAIS-III/WMS-III demographically corrected factor scores in neuropsychological assessment.

Authors:  M J Taylor; R K Heaton
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.892

2.  Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Reisa A Sperling; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; David A Bennett; Suzanne Craft; Anne M Fagan; Takeshi Iwatsubo; Clifford R Jack; Jeffrey Kaye; Thomas J Montine; Denise C Park; Eric M Reiman; Christopher C Rowe; Eric Siemers; Yaakov Stern; Kristine Yaffe; Maria C Carrillo; Bill Thies; Marcelle Morrison-Bogorad; Molly V Wagster; Creighton H Phelps
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 21.566

3.  Detection of malingering using atypical performance patterns on standard neuropsychological tests.

Authors:  Glenn J Larrabee
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  Setting empirical cut-offs on psychometric indicators of negative response bias: a methodological commentary with recommendations.

Authors:  Kevin W Greve; Kevin J Bianchini
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.813

5.  Validation of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status--effort index in a veteran sample.

Authors:  J Christopher Young; Brandon C Baughman; Brad L Roper
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.535

6.  Embedded indices of effort in the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS) in a geriatric sample.

Authors:  Marie D Barker; Michael David Horner; David L Bachman
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.535

7.  The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status effort scale.

Authors:  Julia Novitski; Shelly Steele; Stella Karantzoulis; Christopher Randolph
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.813

8.  Comparison of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Effort Index and stand-alone symptom validity tests in a military sample.

Authors:  Patrick Armistead-Jehle; Christopher L Hansen
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 2.813

9.  American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering.

Authors:  Robert L Heilbronner; Jerry J Sweet; Joel E Morgan; Glenn J Larrabee; Scott R Millis
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.535

10.  High specificity of the medical symptom validity test in patients with very severe memory impairment.

Authors:  Ankush Singhal; Paul Green; Kunle Ashaye; Kuttalingam Shankar; David Gill
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 2.813

View more
  1 in total

1.  RBANS Validity Indices: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Robert D Shura; Timothy W Brearly; Jared A Rowland; Sarah L Martindale; Holly M Miskey; Kevin Duff
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 7.444

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.