Literature DB >> 17225145

[Negative response bias and the validity of personality profiles in neuropsychiatric assessment].

T Merten1, E Friedel, G Mehren, A Stevens.   

Abstract

Although symptom validity tests have become available to German test users during the last few years, there is very little research into measures of negative response bias in personality assessment. The present study investigates the effects of negative response bias as measured by the Word Memory Test (WMT) and the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) on self-report personality scales. A retrospective analysis was performed on data from 93 patients who had undergone neuropsychiatric assessment in the context of independent medical examination. Complete data sets were available for the WMT, the SIMS, and the Freiburg Personality Inventory-Revised (FPI-R). Significant differences were found for a number of personality scales, depending on WMT and SIMS classification. The FPI-R validity scale (Openness) was linked to neither WMT nor SIMS, whereas the results in the latter two instruments showed a significant overlap of classification results (phi=0.44). A principal axis analysis yielded corresponding results. It is concluded that self-report personality measures may be considerably distorted by negative response bias. FPI-R Openness scale scores do not allow any interpretation in terms of negative response bias. More effort should be directed in German-speaking countries towards the development and validation of appropriate validity scales.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17225145     DOI: 10.1007/s00115-006-2101-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nervenarzt        ISSN: 0028-2804            Impact factor:   1.214


  15 in total

1.  [Is presentation of symptoms enough for detection of an illness? On the correlation between symptoms, findings, diagnosis and disability].

Authors:  A Stevens; K Foerster
Journal:  Versicherungsmedizin       Date:  2000-06-01

Review 2.  [Neuropsychological assessment of malingering].

Authors:  T Merten
Journal:  Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 0.752

3.  Detection of feigned mental disorders: a meta-analysis of the MMPI-2 and malingering.

Authors:  Richard Rogers; Kenneth W Sewell; Mary A Martin; Michael J Vitacco
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2003-06

4.  The unexamined lie is a lie worth fibbing: neuropsychological malingering and the Word Memory Test.

Authors:  David E Hartman
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.813

5.  Detection of malingering: validation of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS).

Authors:  G P Smith; G K Burger
Journal:  J Am Acad Psychiatry Law       Date:  1997

6.  Post-injury malingering is seldom a calculated ploy.

Authors:  M Braverman
Journal:  Occup Health Saf       Date:  1978 Mar-Apr

7.  MMPI-2 base rates for 492 personal injury plaintiffs: implications and challenges for forensic assessment.

Authors:  P R Lees-Haley
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  1997-11

8.  [The German version of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology: SIMS].

Authors:  M Cima; S Hollnack; K Kremer; E Knauer; R Schellbach-Matties; B Klein; H Merckelbach
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.214

9.  [Insufficient cooperativeness in forensic neuropsychiatric assessment: prevalence estimates of negative response bias].

Authors:  Th Merten; E Friedel; A Stevens
Journal:  Versicherungsmedizin       Date:  2006-03-01

10.  Depressive symptoms and neurocognitive test scores in patients passing symptom validity tests.

Authors:  Martin L Rohling; Paul Green; Lyle M Allen; Grant L Iverson
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.813

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Classification accuracy of the symptom validity tests Word Memory Test and the German version of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology].

Authors:  Lennart Kirchhoff; Tilman Steinert
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  [Response distortion or symptom severity? Symptom description by psychiatric patients and sociomedical assessment subjects].

Authors:  Maximilian Wertz; Eva Mader; Norbert Nedopil; Kolja Schiltz; Elena Yundina
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Development and evaluation of a standardized peer-training in the context of peer review for quality assurance in work capacity evaluation.

Authors:  André Strahl; Christian Gerlich; Georg W Alpers; Katja Ehrmann; Jörg Gehrke; Annette Müller-Garnn; Heiner Vogel
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.463

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.