Literature DB >> 11291735

The effect of frequency on the visual perception of relative phase and phase variability of two oscillating objects.

G P Bingham1, F T Zaal, J A Shull, D R Collins.   

Abstract

Relative phase has been studied extensively as a measure of interlimb coordination. Only two relative phases, namely 0 degrees and 180 degrees, are stably produced at the preferred frequency (approximately 1 Hz). When frequency is increased, movement at 180 degrees becomes unstable and relative phase typically switches to 0 degrees, which remains stable at higher frequencies. The current study was designed to investigate the perception of relative phase and of phase variability. Observers viewed two circles moving rhythmically in a computer display. Mean phases varied from 0 degrees to 180 degrees in 30 degrees steps. Phase variability at each mean phase varied from 0 degrees to 5 degrees, 10 degrees, and 15 degrees phase standard deviation (SD). Frequency of oscillation was either 0.75 Hz or 1.25 Hz. One group of ten observers judged mean relative phase. Another group judged phase variability. As predicted, increase in frequency yielded an increase in perceived phase variability at 180 degrees mean phase and other mean phases, but not at 0 degrees mean phase. In contrast, increase in actual phase variability affected judgments of 0 degrees mean phase most strongly. A second control experiment showed that the frequency effects were not produced by changes in display durations or frames per cycle of oscillation. The results are consistent with those in studies of interlimb coordination and indicate that understanding of interlimb coordination requires further investigation of phase perception.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11291735     DOI: 10.1007/s002210000610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  23 in total

1.  Observational practice benefits are limited to perceptual improvements in the acquisition of a novel coordination skill.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Nicola J Hodges; Olav E Krigolson; Todd C Handy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The stability of rhythmic movement coordination depends on relative speed: the Bingham model supported.

Authors:  Winona Snapp-Childs; Andrew D Wilson; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Observation and physical practice: different practice contexts lead to similar outcomes for the acquisition of kinematic information.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Inchon Park
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-11-19

4.  Dynamics of learning and transfer of muscular and spatial relative phase in bimanual coordination: evidence for abstract directional codes.

Authors:  J J Temprado; S P Swinnen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-08-11       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effect of visual transformation on bimanual circling movement.

Authors:  Saeka Tomatsu; Tatsuyuki Ohtsuki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Stability of rhythmic visuo-motor tracking does not depend on relative velocity.

Authors:  Aymar de Rugy; Olivier Oullier; Jean-Jacques Temprado
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The coordination patterns observed when two hands reach-to-grasp separate objects.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Bingham; Kirstie Hughes; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Location but not amount of stimulus occlusion influences the stability of visuo-motor coordination.

Authors:  Alen Hajnal; Michael J Richardson; Steven J Harrison; R C Schmidt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The perception-action dynamics of action competency are altered by both physical and observational training.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Jorge Ramos; Nina Robson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Location but not amount of stimulus occlusion influences the stability of visuomotor coordination.

Authors:  Alen Hajnal; Michael J Richardson; Steven J Harrison; R C Schmidt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.