Literature DB >> 15894609

Physics-based protein-structure prediction using a hierarchical protocol based on the UNRES force field: assessment in two blind tests.

S Ołdziej1, C Czaplewski, A Liwo, M Chinchio, M Nanias, J A Vila, M Khalili, Y A Arnautova, A Jagielska, M Makowski, H D Schafroth, R Kaźmierkiewicz, D R Ripoll, J Pillardy, J A Saunders, Y K Kang, K D Gibson, H A Scheraga.   

Abstract

Recent improvements in the protein-structure prediction method developed in our laboratory, based on the thermodynamic hypothesis, are described. The conformational space is searched extensively at the united-residue level by using our physics-based UNRES energy function and the conformational space annealing method of global optimization. The lowest-energy coarse-grained structures are then converted to an all-atom representation and energy-minimized with the ECEPP/3 force field. The procedure was assessed in two recent blind tests of protein-structure prediction. During the first blind test, we predicted large fragments of alpha and alpha+beta proteins [60-70 residues with C(alpha) rms deviation (rmsd) <6 A]. However, for alpha+beta proteins, significant topological errors occurred despite low rmsd values. In the second exercise, we predicted whole structures of five proteins (two alpha and three alpha+beta, with sizes of 53-235 residues) with remarkably good accuracy. In particular, for the genomic target TM0487 (a 102-residue alpha+beta protein from Thermotoga maritima), we predicted the complete, topologically correct structure with 7.3-A C(alpha) rmsd. So far this protein is the largest alpha+beta protein predicted based solely on the amino acid sequence and a physics-based potential-energy function and search procedure. For target T0198, a phosphate transport system regulator PhoU from T. maritima (a 235-residue mainly alpha-helical protein), we predicted the topology of the whole six-helix bundle correctly within 8 A rmsd, except the 32 C-terminal residues, most of which form a beta-hairpin. These and other examples described in this work demonstrate significant progress in physics-based protein-structure prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15894609      PMCID: PMC1140449          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0502655102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  29 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Evolution of physics-based methodology for exploring the conformational energy landscape of proteins.

Authors:  Harold A Scheraga; Jaroslaw Pillardy; Adam Liwo; Jooyoung Lee; Cezary Czaplewski; Daniel R Ripoll; William J Wedemeyer; Yelena A Arnautova
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Energy-based reconstruction of a protein backbone from its alpha-carbon trace by a Monte-Carlo method.

Authors:  Rajmund Kaźmierkiewicz; Adam Liwo; Harold A Scheraga
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  A "FRankenstein's monster" approach to comparative modeling: merging the finest fragments of Fold-Recognition models and iterative model refinement aided by 3D structure evaluation.

Authors:  Jan Kosinski; Iwona A Cymerman; Marcin Feder; Michal A Kurowski; Joanna M Sasin; Janusz M Bujnicki
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003

5.  Protein structure prediction of CASP5 comparative modeling and fold recognition targets using consensus alignment approach and 3D assessment.

Authors:  Krzysztof Ginalski; Leszek Rychlewski
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003

6.  Novel use of a genetic algorithm for protein structure prediction: searching template and sequence alignment space.

Authors:  Bruno Contreras-Moreira; Paul W Fitzjohn; Marc Offman; Graham R Smith; Paul A Bates
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003

7.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-round V.

Authors:  John Moult; Krzysztof Fidelis; Adam Zemla; Tim Hubbard
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003

8.  Packing helices in proteins by global optimization of a potential energy function.

Authors:  Marian Nanias; Maurizio Chinchio; Jarosław Pillardy; Daniel R Ripoll; Harold A Scheraga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Addition of side chains to a known backbone with defined side-chain centroids.

Authors:  Rajmund Kaźmierkiewicz; Adam Liwo; Harold A Scheraga
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.352

10.  Molecular simulation study of cooperativity in hydrophobic association: clusters of four hydrophobic particles.

Authors:  Cezary Czaplewski; Sylwia Rodziewicz-Motowidło; Magdalena Dabal; Adam Liwo; Daniel R Ripoll; Harold A Scheraga
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.352

View more
  48 in total

1.  Molecular Simulations Find Stable Structures in Fragments of Protein G.

Authors:  Tjaša Urbič; Tomaž Urbič; Franc Avbelj; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Acta Chim Slov       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 1.735

2.  PRIMO: A Transferable Coarse-grained Force Field for Proteins.

Authors:  Parimal Kar; Srinivasa Murthy Gopal; Yi-Ming Cheng; Alexander Predeus; Michael Feig
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Molecular dynamics with the united-residue model of polypeptide chains. I. Lagrange equations of motion and tests of numerical stability in the microcanonical mode.

Authors:  Mey Khalili; Adam Liwo; Franciszek Rakowski; Paweł Grochowski; Harold A Scheraga
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Molecular dynamics with the United-residue force field: ab initio folding simulations of multichain proteins.

Authors:  Ana V Rojas; Adam Liwo; Harold A Scheraga
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Modification and optimization of the united-residue (UNRES) potential energy function for canonical simulations. I. Temperature dependence of the effective energy function and tests of the optimization method with single training proteins.

Authors:  Adam Liwo; Mey Khalili; Cezary Czaplewski; Sebastian Kalinowski; Staniłsaw Ołdziej; Katarzyna Wachucik; Harold A Scheraga
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Protein folding by zipping and assembly.

Authors:  S Banu Ozkan; G Albert Wu; John D Chodera; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Ab initio protein structure prediction using chunk-TASSER.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 8.  Computational techniques for efficient conformational sampling of proteins.

Authors:  Adam Liwo; Cezary Czaplewski; Stanisław Ołdziej; Harold A Scheraga
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 6.809

9.  Protein structure prediction by pro-Sp3-TASSER.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Implementation of a Serial Replica Exchange Method in a Physics-Based United-Residue (UNRES) Force Field.

Authors:  Hujun Shen; Cezary Czaplewski; Adam Liwo; Harold A Scheraga
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.