Literature DB >> 23503877

1.2 French stone retrieval baskets further enhance irrigation flow in flexible ureterorenoscopy.

Jens Bedke1, Ulf Leichtle, Andrea Lorenz, Udo Nagele, Arnulf Stenzl, Stephan Kruck.   

Abstract

Ureterorenoscopy (URS) has revolutionized upper urinary tract stone therapy. However, the size of the working channel and the stone baskets limit irrigation flow as well as vision. This study determined further improvements of irrigation flow, deflection capacities and impairments of breaking resistance in a new 1.2 French (F) ultra-miniaturized basket. Irrigation measurements were performed in semirigid URS (semiURS, working channel 5F) and in flexible URS (flexURS, 3.6F) in 0°, 90° and 270° deflection with 1.2F, 1.8F, 1.9F and 2.2F baskets and compared with empty channel. Breaking strength of 1.2F, 1.8F and 1.9F baskets were evaluated using a material testing machine. Tested baskets affected irrigation in semiURS and flexURS (p < 0.05). Mean ± SEM (standard error of the mean) for semiURS flow rates counted 197.1 ± 2.0, 140.9 ± 1.6, 111.1 ± 1.5, 98.0 ± 1.3 and 77.1 ± 0.9 ml/min for empty channel, 1.2F, 1.8F, 1.9F and 2.2F baskets (p < 0.05). Using unbent flexURS flow rates of 44.2 ± 0.4, 20.4 ± 0.2, 5.9 ± 0.1, 5.4 ± 0.1 and 1.5 ± 0.1 ml/min for empty channel, 1.2F, 1.8F, 1.9F and 2.2F baskets, were observed (p < 0.05). The 1.2F versus 2.2F basket showed a 13.6-fold increase in flexURS irrigation (p < 0.05), while only the 2.2F basket reduced deflection by 20.3 %. The breaking strength decreased with a reduced basket size (1.2F: 6.4 ± 0.46 vs. 1.8F: 16.8 ± 2.79 vs. 1.9F: 32.2 ± 2.74 N, p < 0.05). Ultra-miniaturized baskets of 1.2F ensured a sufficient irrigation flow as needed for high quality vision in URS stone management. However, miniaturization of the 1.2F basket resulted in a reduced breaking strength compared with larger sized devices which in turn may hamper stone removal by an increased vulnerability.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23503877     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-012-0540-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  16 in total

1.  Flexible ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of lower pole calyx stones: influence of different lithotripsy probes and stone extraction tools on scope deflection and irrigation flow.

Authors:  Maurice Stephan Michel; Thomas Knoll; Taras Ptaschnyk; Kai Uwe Köhrmann; Peter Alken
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Critical analysis of the miniaturized stone basket: effect on deflection and flow rate.

Authors:  Ahmed Magheli; Michelle Jo Semins; Mohamad E Allaf; Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Radial dilation force of tipless and helical stone baskets.

Authors:  Kari Hendlin; Courtney Lee; J Kyle Anderson; Manoj Monga
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Comparison of flexible ureteroscopes: deflection, irrigant flow and optical characteristics.

Authors:  Corollos Abdelshehid; Michael T Ahlering; David Chou; Hyung Keun Park; Jay Basillote; David Lee; Isaac Kim; Louis Eichel; Dmitriy Protsenko; Brian Wong; Elspeth McDougall; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  [S2 guidelines on diagnostic, therapy and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis : Part 1: Diagnostic and therapy].

Authors:  T Knoll
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and conventional flexible ureteroscopes.

Authors:  Ugur Boylu; Mathew Oommen; Raju Thomas; Benjamin R Lee
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Flow matters: irrigation flow differs in flexible ureteroscopes of the newest generation.

Authors:  Stephan Kruck; Aristoteles G Anastasiadis; Georgios Gakis; Ute Walcher; Joerg Hennenlotter; Axel S Merseburger; Arnulf Stenzl; Udo Nagele
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-03-26

8.  Small-diameter nitinol stone baskets: radial dilation force and dynamics of opening.

Authors:  Emily Korman; Kari Hendlin; Manoj Monga
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Biomechanical proof of barbed sutures for the efficacy of laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Bastian Amend; Otto Müller; Jens Bedke; Ulf Leichtle; Udo Nagele; Stephan Kruck; Arnulf Stenzl; Karl-Dietrich Sievert
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors.

Authors:  Victoriano Romero; Haluk Akpinar; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2010
View more
  4 in total

1.  Thermal effects of Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy during retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in an ex vivo porcine kidney model.

Authors:  Simon Hein; Ralf Petzold; Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola; Philippe-Fabian Müller; Martin Schoenthaler; Arkadiusz Miernik
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Single-use versus reusable ureterorenoscopes for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): systematic comparative analysis of physical and optical properties in three different devices.

Authors:  Susanne Deininger; Luis Haberstock; Stephan Kruck; Eva Neumann; Ines Anselmo da Costa; Tilman Todenhöfer; Jens Bedke; Arnulf Stenzl; Steffen Rausch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Disposable devices for RIRS: where do we stand in 2013? What do we need in the future?

Authors:  Richard H Shin; Michael E Lipkin; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Pushing the boundaries of ureteroscopy: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Petrisor Geavlete; Razvan Multescu; Bogdan Geavlete
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 14.432

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.