Literature DB >> 15879783

Prostate cancer detection in men with prostate specific antigen 4 to 10 ng/ml using a combined approach of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted and systematic biopsy.

Alexandre Pelzer1, Jasmin Bektic, Andreas P Berger, Leo Pallwein, Ethan J Halpern, Wolfgang Horninger, Georg Bartsch, Ferdinand Frauscher.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Transrectal gray scale ultrasound guided biopsy is the standard method for diagnosing prostate cancer (PC). Improved cancer detection with ultrasound contrast agents is related to better detection of tumor vascularity. We evaluated the impact of a combined approach of contrast enhanced, color Doppler targeted biopsy (CECD) and systematic biopsy (SB) for the PC detection rate in men with prostate specific antigen (PSA) 4.0 to 10 ng/ml.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 380 screening volunteers with a total PSA of 4.0 to 10 ng/ml (percent free PSA less than 18). CECD was always performed before SB. Another investigator blinded to contrast enhanced findings performed 10 SBs. The cancer detection rate for the CECD, SB and combined approaches was assessed.
RESULTS: PC was detected in 143 of 380 patients (37.6%, mean total PSA 6.2 ng/ml). The PC detection rate for CECD and for SB was 27.4% and 27.6%, respectively. The overall cancer detection rate with the 2 methods combined was 37.6%. For targeted biopsy cores the detection rate was significantly better than for SB cores (32.6% vs 17.9%, p <0.01). CECD in a patient with cancer was 3.1-fold more likely to detect PC than SB.
CONCLUSIONS: CECD allows for the detection of lesions that cannot be found on gray scale ultrasound or SB. CECD allows for assessment of neovascularity associated with PC. However, the combined use of CECD and SB allows for maximal detection of PC with a detection rate of 37.6% in our patients with PSA 4 to 10 ng/ml.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15879783     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000158444.56199.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  20 in total

1.  Prospective blinded comparison of real-time sonoelastography targeted versus randomised biopsy of the prostate in the primary and re-biopsy setting.

Authors:  Roman Ganzer; Andreas Brandtner; Wolf F Wieland; Hans-Martin Fritsche
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  [Multiparametric MRI, elastography, contrastenhanced TRUS. Are there indications with reliable diagnostic advantages before prostate biopsy?].

Authors:  A Hegele; L Skrobek; R Hofmann; P Olbert
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  A comparison of the diagnostic performance of systematic versus ultrasound-guided biopsies of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Hilco van Moerkerk; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; J Alfred Witjes; Ferdinand Frauscher; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Using biopsy to detect prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Claus G Roehrborn
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

5.  [Imaging diagnostics of the prostate].

Authors:  D J Dinter; A M Weidner; F Wenz; A E Pelzer; M S Michel; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Comparative efficiency of contrast-enhanced colour Doppler ultrasound targeted versus systematic biopsy for prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Michael Josef Mitterberger; Friedrich Aigner; Wolfgang Horninger; Hanno Ulmer; Silvio Cavuto; Ethan J Halpern; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  New horizons in prostate cancer imaging.

Authors:  Gregory Ravizzini; Baris Turkbey; Karen Kurdziel; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 8.  Imaging localized prostate cancer: current approaches and new developments.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Paul S Albert; Karen Kurdziel; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  Transrectal contrast enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  M H Wink; J J M C H de la Rosette; C A Grimbergen; H Wijkstra
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Contrast-enhanced harmonic ultrasonography for the assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Yunkai Zhu; Yaqing Chen; Jun Jiang; Ren Wang; Yongchang Zhou; Huizhen Zhang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.