OBJECTIVES: To determine whether families of patients who enroll in hospice near the end of life believe that they receive less benefit from hospice services than families of patients who enroll earlier. DESIGN: Semistructured interviews at the time of hospice enrollment and 1 month after the patient's death. SETTING: This study was conducted at the Hospice of Lancaster County, Lancaster, PA, over a 12-month period spanning 2003-2004. PARTICIPANTS: First-time hospice admissions. MEASUREMENTS: Interviews assessed the anticipated helpfulness of six hospice services (enrollment interviews) and the actual helpfulness of the same services (follow-up interviews). RESULTS: Length of stay in hospice was associated with families' reports of the number of services provided (Spearman rho=0.34, P<.001), and with the mean helpfulness ratings for the services that were provided (Spearman rho=0.34, P<.001), although even with short lengths of stay, most families reported that they received the services that they anticipated and that those services were helpful. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that families feel they receive greater benefits from longer lengths of stay in hospice. Future efforts to define an "optimal" length of stay in hospice should consider patients' and families' perceptions of the benefits that hospice offers.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether families of patients who enroll in hospice near the end of life believe that they receive less benefit from hospice services than families of patients who enroll earlier. DESIGN: Semistructured interviews at the time of hospice enrollment and 1 month after the patient's death. SETTING: This study was conducted at the Hospice of Lancaster County, Lancaster, PA, over a 12-month period spanning 2003-2004. PARTICIPANTS: First-time hospice admissions. MEASUREMENTS: Interviews assessed the anticipated helpfulness of six hospice services (enrollment interviews) and the actual helpfulness of the same services (follow-up interviews). RESULTS: Length of stay in hospice was associated with families' reports of the number of services provided (Spearman rho=0.34, P<.001), and with the mean helpfulness ratings for the services that were provided (Spearman rho=0.34, P<.001), although even with short lengths of stay, most families reported that they received the services that they anticipated and that those services were helpful. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that families feel they receive greater benefits from longer lengths of stay in hospice. Future efforts to define an "optimal" length of stay in hospice should consider patients' and families' perceptions of the benefits that hospice offers.
Authors: David J Casarett; Sue Farrington; Teresa Craig; Julie Slattery; Joan Harrold; Betty Oldanie; Jason Roy; Richard Biehl; Joan Teno Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2012-05-14 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Laura P Gelfman; Yolanda Barrón; Stanley Moore; Christopher M Murtaugh; Anuradha Lala; Melissa D Aldridge; Nathan E Goldstein Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2018-08-08 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: M Alexis Kirk; Emily R Haines; Franziska S Rokoske; Byron J Powell; Morris Weinberger; Laura C Hanson; Sarah A Birken Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2021-02-11 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Eliza M Park; Allison M Deal; Justin M Yopp; Teresa P Edwards; Douglas J Wilson; Laura C Hanson; Donald L Rosenstein Journal: BMJ Support Palliat Care Date: 2015-12-18 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: Amy S Kelley; Partha Deb; Qingling Du; Melissa D Aldridge Carlson; R Sean Morrison Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Jessica Fishman; Peter O'Dwyer; Hien L Lu; Hope R Henderson; Hope Henderson; David A Asch; David J Casarett Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-02-01 Impact factor: 6.860