Literature DB >> 19107761

Race, treatment preferences, and hospice enrollment: eligibility criteria may exclude patients with the greatest needs for care.

Jessica Fishman1, Peter O'Dwyer, Hien L Lu, Hope R Henderson, Hope Henderson, David A Asch, David J Casarett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The requirement that patients give up curative treatment makes hospice enrollment unappealing for some patients and may particularly limit use among African-American patients. The current study was conducted to determine whether African-American patients with cancer are more likely than white patients to have preferences for cancer treatment that exclude them from hospice and whether they are less likely to want specific hospice services.
METHODS: Two hundred eighty-three patients who were receiving treatment for cancer at 6 oncology clinics within the University of Pennsylvania Cancer Network completed conjoint interviews measuring their perceived need for 5 hospice services and their preferences for continuing cancer treatment. Patients were followed for 6 months or until death.
RESULTS: African-American patients had stronger preferences for continuing their cancer treatments on a 7-point scale even after adjusting for age, sex, finances, education, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, quality of life, and physical and psychologic symptom burden (adjusted mean score, 4.75 vs 3.96; beta coefficient, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-1.41 [P = .007]). African-American patients also had greater perceived needs for hospice services after adjusting for these characteristics (adjusted mean score, 2.31 vs 1.83; beta coefficient, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.92 [P = .01]). However, this effect disappeared after adjusting for household finances.
CONCLUSIONS: Hospice eligibility criteria may exclude African-American patients disproportionately despite greater perceived needs for hospice services in this population. The mechanisms driving this health disparity likely include both cultural differences and economic characteristics, and consideration should be given to redesigning hospice eligibility criteria. (c) 2008 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19107761      PMCID: PMC2647686          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  56 in total

1.  Overcoming obstacles to hospice care: an ethical examination of inertia and inaction.

Authors:  Christopher K Daugherty; David P Steensma
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Race and the intensive care unit: disparities and preferences for end-of-life care.

Authors:  Howard B Degenholtz; Stephen B Thomas; Michael J Miller
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Hospice usage by minorities in the last year of life: results from the National Mortality Followback Survey.

Authors:  K Allen Greiner; Subashan Perera; Jasjit S Ahluwalia
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Performance status assessment in cancer patients.

Authors:  C Conill; E Verger; M Salamero
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation.

Authors:  R M Mickey; S Greenland
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Does receipt of hospice care in nursing homes improve the management of pain at the end of life?

Authors:  Susan C Miller; Vincent Mor; Ning Wu; Pedro Gozalo; Kate Lapane
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Understanding the treatment preferences of seriously ill patients.

Authors:  Terri R Fried; Elizabeth H Bradley; Virginia R Towle; Heather Allore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-04       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Understanding patient preferences for the treatment of lupus nephritis with adaptive conjoint analysis.

Authors:  L Fraenkel; S Bodardus; D R Wittnik; D R Wittink
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Character of terminal illness in the advanced cancer patient: pain and other symptoms during the last four weeks of life.

Authors:  N Coyle; J Adelhardt; K M Foley; R K Portenoy
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  A randomised controlled trial of hospice care.

Authors:  R L Kane; J Wales; L Bernstein; A Leibowitz; S Kaplan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-04-21       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  24 in total

1.  Why don't patients enroll in hospice? Can we do anything about it?

Authors:  Elizabeth K Vig; Helene Starks; Janelle S Taylor; Elizabeth K Hopley; Kelly Fryer-Edwards
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Is public communication about end-of-life care helping to inform all? Cancer news coverage in African American versus mainstream media.

Authors:  Jessica M Fishman; Thomas Ten Have; David Casarett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Hospice use among urban Black and White U.S. nursing home decedents in 2006.

Authors:  Michael J Lepore; Susan C Miller; Pedro Gozalo
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2010-11-12

4.  Variation in Intensity and Costs of Care by Payer and Race for Patients Dying of Cancer in Texas: An Analysis of Registry-linked Medicaid, Medicare, and Dually Eligible Claims Data.

Authors:  B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Kai-Ping Liao; Sharon H Giordano; Linda S Elting; Ya-Chen T Shih
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Functional trajectories in the year before hospice.

Authors:  Hans F Stabenau; Laura J Morrison; Evelyne A Gahbauer; Linda Leo-Summers; Heather G Allore; Thomas M Gill
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Quality of Hospice Care at Home Versus in an Assisted Living Facility or Nursing Home.

Authors:  Kathleen T Unroe; Timothy E Stump; Shannon Effler; Wanzhu Tu; Christopher M Callahan
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Racial and ethnic disparities in meeting Part D MTM eligibility criteria among the non-Medicare population.

Authors:  Junling Wang; Lawrence M Brown; Song Hee Hong
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct

8.  Racial differences in location before hospice enrollment and association with hospice length of stay.

Authors:  Kimberly S Johnson; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; James A Tulsky
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Hospice utilization in patients with malignant gliomas.

Authors:  Deborah Forst; Eric Adams; Ryan Nipp; Allison Martin; Areej El-Jawahri; Ayal Aizer; Justin T Jordan
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 12.300

10.  Geographic variation in black-white differences in end-of-life care for patients with ESRD.

Authors:  Bernadette A Thomas; Rudolph A Rodriguez; Edward J Boyko; Cassianne Robinson-Cohen; Annette L Fitzpatrick; Ann M O'Hare
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 8.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.