Literature DB >> 31793635

A case study of a theory-based method for identifying and reporting core functions and forms of evidence-based interventions.

M Alexis Kirk1, Emily R Haines2, Franziska S Rokoske3, Byron J Powell4, Morris Weinberger2, Laura C Hanson5, Sarah A Birken2.   

Abstract

Adaptation of existing evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to improve their fit in new contexts is common. A critical first step in adaptation is to identify core functions (purposes) and forms (activities) of EBIs. Core functions should not be adapted as they are what account for the efficacy of EBIs. Despite their importance, core functions are rarely identified by EBI developers; methods for identifying them post hoc are lacking. We present a case study of theory-based methods for identifying core functions and forms post hoc. We developed these methods as the first step in a larger effort to adapt an existing EBI to improve the timeliness of referrals to hospice to a new patient population and care setting. Our methods were rooted in the Planned Adaptation Model (PAM). Through our case study, we developed six steps for identifying core functions and forms, as well as accompanying tools and methods. Our case study further operationalized PAM in several ways. Where PAM offered guiding tenets for identifying core functions and forms (review existing EBI materials, conduct primary data collection, and identify the theory of change), we produced specific tools (interview guides and codebooks) and methods (sampling approaches and analytic methods). Our case study extended PAM with the addition of two steps in the process of identifying core functions and forms: (a) identifying the usual care pathway, including barriers to the outcome of interest encountered in usual care, and (b) mapping EBI core functions onto an extant theory. Identifying core functions and forms is a critical first step in the adaptation process to ensure adaptations do not inadvertently compromise the efficacy or effectiveness of the EBI by compromising core functions. Our case study presents step-by-step methods that could be used by researchers or practitioners to identify core functions and forms post hoc. © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2019. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complex health intervention; Core components; Core functions; Form; Planned Adaptation Model; Program adaptation; Qualitative research; Theory-based research

Year:  2021        PMID: 31793635      PMCID: PMC7877297          DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibz178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.046


  25 in total

1.  The cultural adaptation of prevention interventions: resolving tensions between fidelity and fit.

Authors:  Felipe González Castro; Manuel Barrera; Charles R Martinez
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2004-03

2.  Barriers to hospice care in Alabama: provider-based perceptions.

Authors:  Todd M Jenkins; Kathryn L Chapman; Christine S Ritchie; Donna K Arnett; Gerald McGwin; Stacey S Cofield; H Micheal Maetz
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  The tug-of-war: fidelity versus adaptation throughout the health promotion program life cycle.

Authors:  Melissa Bopp; Ruth P Saunders; Diana Lattimore
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2013-06

4.  Impact of individual and market factors on the timing of initiation of hospice terminal care.

Authors:  N A Christakis; T J Iwashyna
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Does hospice improve quality of care for persons dying from dementia?

Authors:  Joan M Teno; Pedro L Gozalo; Ian C Lee; Sylvia Kuo; Carol Spence; Stephen R Connor; David J Casarett
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Communication between physicians and family caregivers about care at the end of life: when do discussions occur and what is said?

Authors:  Emily Cherlin; Terri Fried; Holly G Prigerson; Dena Schulman-Green; Rosemary Johnson-Hurzeler; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.947

7.  Barriers and enablers to hospice referrals: an expert overview.

Authors:  Betsy T Friedman; M Kay Harwood; Matthew Shields
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.947

8.  Replicating an intervention: the tension between fidelity and adaptation.

Authors:  Diane M Morrison; Marilyn J Hoppe; Mary Rogers Gillmore; Carisa Kluver; Darrel Higa; Elizabeth A Wells
Journal:  AIDS Educ Prev       Date:  2009-04

9.  Daily stress, coping, and well-being in parents of children with autism: a multilevel modeling approach.

Authors:  Colin G Pottie; Kathleen M Ingram
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2008-12

Review 10.  Contribution of Tau Pathology to Mitochondrial Impairment in Neurodegeneration.

Authors:  María J Pérez; Claudia Jara; Rodrigo A Quintanilla
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  11 in total

1.  Understanding key implementation determinants for a school-based universal prevention intervention: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Andria B Eisman; Sarah Kiperman; Laney A Rupp; Amy M Kilbourne; Lawrence A Palinkas
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Conceptualizing clinical decision support as complex interventions: a meta-analysis of comparative effectiveness trials.

Authors:  Thomas J Reese; Siru Liu; Bryan Steitz; Allison McCoy; Elise Russo; Brian Koh; Jessica Ancker; Adam Wright
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 7.942

3.  Developing personalized survivorship care pathways in the United States: Existing resources and remaining challenges.

Authors:  Caitlin B Biddell; Lisa P Spees; Deborah K Mayer; Stephanie B Wheeler; Justin G Trogdon; Jason Rotter; Sarah A Birken
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Understanding how context and culture in six communities can shape implementation of a complex intervention: a comparative case study.

Authors:  Jessica Gaber; Julie Datta; Rebecca Clark; Larkin Lamarche; Fiona Parascandalo; Stephanie Di Pelino; Pamela Forsyth; Doug Oliver; Dee Mangin; David Price
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  An Evidence-Based Practice Developed in-situ: Let's Talk About Children and a Consolidation of Its Evidence Base.

Authors:  Becca Allchin; Tytti Solantaus
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  Context counts: a qualitative study exploring the interplay between context and implementation success.

Authors:  Lisa Rogers; Aoife De Brún; Sarah A Birken; Carmel Davies; Eilish McAuliffe
Journal:  J Health Organ Manag       Date:  2021-03-09

7.  Identifying Core Functions of an Evidence-Based Intervention to Improve Cancer Care Quality in Rural Hospitals.

Authors:  Madison M Wahlen; Mary C Schroeder; Erin C Johnson; Ingrid M Lizarraga; Jacklyn M Engelbart; David J Tatman; Cheyenne Wagi; Mary E Charlton; Sarah A Birken
Journal:  Front Health Serv       Date:  2022-04-28

Review 8.  Focusing on fidelity: narrative review and recommendations for improving intervention fidelity within trials of health behaviour change interventions.

Authors:  E Toomey; W Hardeman; N Hankonen; M Byrne; J McSharry; K Matvienko-Sikar; F Lorencatto
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2020-03-12

9.  The what, why and when of adapting interventions for new contexts: A qualitative study of researchers, funders, journal editors and practitioners' understandings.

Authors:  Lauren Copeland; Hannah Littlecott; Danielle Couturiaux; Pat Hoddinott; Jeremy Segrott; Simon Murphy; Graham Moore; Rhiannon Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.752

10.  Towards a comprehensive model for understanding adaptations' impact: the model for adaptation design and impact (MADI).

Authors:  M Alexis Kirk; Julia E Moore; Shannon Wiltsey Stirman; Sarah A Birken
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.