Shi-Yi Wang1,2, Melissa D Aldridge3, Cary P Gross2,4, Maureen Canavan5, Emily Cherlin5, Rosemary Johnson-Hurzeler6, Elizabeth Bradley5. 1. 1 Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale University School of Public Health , New Haven, Connecticut. 2. 2 Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale Cancer Center and Yale University School of Medicine , New Haven, Connecticut. 3. 3 Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York and James J. Peters VA Medical Center , Bronx, New York. 4. 4 Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine , New Haven, Connecticut. 5. 5 Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale University School of Public Health , New Haven, Connecticut. 6. 6 John D. Thompson Hospice Institute for Education, Training, and Research, Inc. , Branford, Connecticut.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about state-level variation in patterns of hospice use, an important indicator of quality of care at the end of life. Findings may identify states where targeted efforts for improving end-of-life care may be warranted. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to characterize the state-level variation in patterns of hospice use among decedents and to examine state, county, and individual factors associated with these patterns. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of Medicare fee-for-service decedents. The primary outcome measures were state-level hospice use during the last 6 months of life and the state's proportion of hospice users with very short hospice enrollment (≤7 days), very long hospice enrollment (≥180 days), and hospice disenrollment prior to death. RESULTS: In 2011, the percentage of decedents who used hospice in the last 6 months of life nationally was 47.1%, and varied across states from 20.3% in Alaska to 60.8% in Utah. Hospice utilization patterns also varied by state, with the percentage of hospice users with very short hospice enrollment ranging from 23.0% in the District of Columbia to 39.9% in Connecticut. The percentage of very long hospice use varied from 5.7% in Connecticut to 15.9% in Delaware. The percentage of hospice disenrollment ranged from 6.2% in Hawaii to 19.0% in the District of Columbia. Nationally, state-level hospice use among decedents was positively correlated with the percentage of potentially concerning patterns (including very short hospice enrollment, very long hospice enrollment, and hospice disenrollment) among hospice users (the Pearson correlation coefficient=0.52, p value<0.001). Oregon was the only state in the highest quartile of hospice use and the lowest quartiles of both very short and very long hospice enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of decedents who use hospice may mask important state-level variation in these patterns, including the timing of hospice enrollment, a potentially important component of the quality of end-of-life care.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about state-level variation in patterns of hospice use, an important indicator of quality of care at the end of life. Findings may identify states where targeted efforts for improving end-of-life care may be warranted. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to characterize the state-level variation in patterns of hospice use among decedents and to examine state, county, and individual factors associated with these patterns. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of Medicare fee-for-service decedents. The primary outcome measures were state-level hospice use during the last 6 months of life and the state's proportion of hospice users with very short hospice enrollment (≤7 days), very long hospice enrollment (≥180 days), and hospice disenrollment prior to death. RESULTS: In 2011, the percentage of decedents who used hospice in the last 6 months of life nationally was 47.1%, and varied across states from 20.3% in Alaska to 60.8% in Utah. Hospice utilization patterns also varied by state, with the percentage of hospice users with very short hospice enrollment ranging from 23.0% in the District of Columbia to 39.9% in Connecticut. The percentage of very long hospice use varied from 5.7% in Connecticut to 15.9% in Delaware. The percentage of hospice disenrollment ranged from 6.2% in Hawaii to 19.0% in the District of Columbia. Nationally, state-level hospice use among decedents was positively correlated with the percentage of potentially concerning patterns (including very short hospice enrollment, very long hospice enrollment, and hospice disenrollment) among hospice users (the Pearson correlation coefficient=0.52, p value<0.001). Oregon was the only state in the highest quartile of hospice use and the lowest quartiles of both very short and very long hospice enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of decedents who use hospice may mask important state-level variation in these patterns, including the timing of hospice enrollment, a potentially important component of the quality of end-of-life care.
Authors: Craig C Earle; Elyse R Park; Bonnie Lai; Jane C Weeks; John Z Ayanian; Susan Block Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alison E Kris; Emily J Cherlin; Holly Prigerson; Melissa D A Carlson; Rosemary Johnson-Hurzeler; Stanislav V Kasl; Elizabeth H Bradley Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Elizabeth H Bradley; Holly Prigerson; Melissa D A Carlson; Emily Cherlin; R Johnson-Hurzeler; Stanislav V Kasl Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Elizabeth Rickerson; Joan Harrold; Jennifer Kapo; Janet T Carroll; David Casarett Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Kathleen T Unroe; Timothy E Stump; Shannon Effler; Wanzhu Tu; Christopher M Callahan Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-02-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Rong Wang; Amer M Zeidan; Stephanie Halene; Xiao Xu; Amy J Davidoff; Scott F Huntington; Nikolai A Podoltsev; Cary P Gross; Steven D Gore; Xiaomei Ma Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Claire K Ankuda; Susan L Mitchell; Pedro Gozalo; Vince Mor; David Meltzer; Joan M Teno Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-03-28 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Shi-Yi Wang; Jane Hall; Craig E Pollack; Kerin Adelson; Elizabeth H Bradley; Jessica B Long; Cary P Gross Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Yasemin Evelyn Turkman; Courtney P Williams; Bradford E Jackson; James Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Richard Taylor; Deborah Ejem; Elizabeth Kvale; Maria Pisu; Marie Bakitas; Gabrielle B Rocque Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2019-04-11 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Laura L Dover; Caleb R Dulaney; Courtney P Williams; John B Fiveash; Bradford E Jackson; Paula P Warren; Elizabeth A Kvale; D Hunter Boggs; Gabrielle B Rocque Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 12.300