Literature DB >> 15877217

Preliminary remarks on a prospective multicenter study of the Repicci minimally invasive unicondylar knee replacement.

Susanne Fuchs1, Helmut Strosche, Werner Tinius, Heinz Gierse, Ullrich Gebhardt.   

Abstract

Prospective multicentric study on unicondylar knee arthroplasties using the minimally invasive method described by Repicci. Three hundred and seventy nine unicondylar knee arthroplasties in patients with an average age of 66 years were examined preoperatively and 40 weeks postoperatively. In 98.4% of the cases the medial compartment was replaced. The examination was documented using the Knee Society Score (KSS). Radiological examination was done using films of the knee in two planes in standing position and a long leg axis film. The mean KSS increased significantly (P<0.005) from 100.1 (SD 21.7) before surgery to 179.1 (SD 24.0) postoperatively. Ninety-five of the patients were subjectively satisfied with the procedure. Using correlation analysis, we found that osteoarthritic changes of the patella had a highly significant (p=0.001) influence on the KSS results. Patient's age and the pain subscale of the KSS also had a highly significant (p=0.01) influence on the KSS result. Short-term results of the Repicci unicondylar arthroplasty using the minimally invasive technique are encouraging in terms of patient satisfaction. It became apparent that osteoarthritic changes of the patella, flexion contractures and extension deficits have a considerable influence on the overall result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15877217     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-005-0618-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  28 in total

1.  Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series.

Authors:  U C Svärd; A J Price
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-03

2.  Orthopaedic crossfire--can we justify unicondylar arthroplasty as a temporizing procedure? in the affirmative.

Authors:  Gerard A Engh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  A kinematic study of lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  B J Robinson; J L Rees; A J Price; D J Beard; D M Murray
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial gonarthrosis: 5 to 9 years follow-up evaluation of 77 knees.

Authors:  Y Hasegawa; Y Ooishi; T Shimizu; H Sugiura; S Takahashi; H Ito; H Iwata
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup.

Authors:  R A Berger; D D Nedeff; R M Barden; M M Sheinkop; J J Jacobs; A G Rosenberg; J O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation.

Authors:  S Ahlbäck
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1968

7.  Radiological changes five years after unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  A E Weale; D W Murray; J Baines; J H Newman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-09

8.  Patellar impingement following unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  P Hernigou; G Deschamps
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Minimally invasive surgical technique for unicondylar knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A Repicci; R W Eberle
Journal:  J South Orthop Assoc       Date:  1999

10.  Orthopaedic crossfire--can we justify unicondylar arthroplasty as a temporizing procedure? in opposition.

Authors:  Thomas P Sculco
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Pre- and postoperative radioligical evaluation of knee joint endoprothesis. Orthopedist's view].

Authors:  F Mazoochian; C Glaser; A Fottner; S M Hauptmann; M Triantafyllou; C von Schulze Pellengahr; M F Reiser; V Jansson
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Good results with minimally invasive unicompartmental knee resurfacing after 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Martin H Redish; Peter Fennema
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-11-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.