Literature DB >> 11041588

Radiological changes five years after unicompartmental knee replacement.

A E Weale1, D W Murray, J Baines, J H Newman.   

Abstract

Failure of a unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) may be caused by progressive osteoarthritis of the knee and/or failure of the prosthesis. Limb alignment can influence both of these factors. We have examined the fate of the other compartments and measured changes in leg alignment after UKR. A total of 50 UKRs was carried out on 45 carefully selected patients between 1989 and 1992. At operation, deliberate attempts were made to avoid overcorrection of the deformity. Four patients died, one patient was lost to follow-up and two knees were revised before review which was at a minimum of five years. Standard long-leg weight-bearing anteroposterior views of the knee and skyline views of the patellofemoral joint were taken before and at eight months and five years after operation. The radiographs of the remaining 43 knees were reviewed twice by blind and randomised assessment to measure the progression of osteoarthritis within the joints. Overcorrection of the deformity in the coronal plane was avoided in all but two knees. Only one showed evidence of progression of osteoarthritis within the patellofemoral joint, and this was only identified in one of the four assessments. Deterioration in the state of the opposite tibiofemoral compartment was not seen. Varus deformity tended to recur. Recurrent varus of 2 degrees was observed between eight months and five years after operation. There was no correlation between the postoperative tibiofemoral angle and the extent of recurrent varus recorded at five years. Changes in alignment may be indicative of minor polyethylene wear or of subsidence of the tibial component. The incidence of progressive osteoarthritis within the knee was very low after UKR. Patients should be carefully selected and overcorrection of the deformity be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11041588     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b7.10466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  17 in total

1.  Fracture of the femoral component of a Brigham unicompartmental knee: a case report.

Authors:  Konstantinos Panousis; Claire Murnaghan; Petra Koettig; Peter Grigoris
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Clinical and functional comparison of uni- and bicondylar sledge prostheses.

Authors:  S Fuchs; C O Tibesku; D Frisse; M Genkinger; H Laass; D Rosenbaum
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement: retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of 83 patients.

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Francesco Iacono; Alessandro Russo; Stefano Zaffagnini; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Simone Bignozzi; Laura Bragonzoni; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Failure of the Patellar Tendon with the Patella Everted versus Noneverted in a Matched-Pair Cadaver Model.

Authors:  James A Ryan; Kathleen N Meyers; Paolo Dibenedetto; Timothy M Wright; Steven B Haas
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2010-01-29

5.  Total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: the TOPKAT RCT.

Authors:  David J Beard; Loretta J Davies; Jonathan A Cook; Graeme MacLennan; Andrew Price; Seamus Kent; Jemma Hudson; Andrew Carr; Jose Leal; Helen Campbell; Ray Fitzpatrick; Nigel Arden; David Murray; Marion K Campbell
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.014

6.  Medial joint line elevation of the tibia measured during surgery has a significant correlation with the limb alignment changes following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yuichi Kuroda; Koji Takayama; Kazunari Ishida; Shinya Hayashi; Shingo Hashimoto; Masanori Tsubosaka; Takehiko Matsushita; Takahiro Niikura; Kotaro Nishida; Ryosuke Kuroda; Tomoyuki Matsumoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Patella baja after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Konstantinos Anagnostakos; Olaf Lorbach; Dieter Kohn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew J Price; Ulf Svard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Proximal tibial bone density is preserved after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bradley I Richmond; Simon V Hadlow; Tim G Lynskey; Cameron G Walker; Jacob T Munro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Tibial component alignment and risk of loosening in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a radiographic and radiostereometric study.

Authors:  P Barbadoro; A Ensini; A Leardini; M d'Amato; A Feliciangeli; A Timoncini; F Amadei; C Belvedere; S Giannini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.