Literature DB >> 15869923

Structural and biomechanical basis of racial and sex differences in vertebral fragility in Chinese and Caucasians.

Yunbo Duan1, Xiao-Fang Wang, Alison Evans, Ego Seeman.   

Abstract

We conducted a cross-sectional study in 1868 healthy Chinese and Caucasian women and men aged 18 to 93 years to define the structural and biomechanical basis for racial and sex differences in vertebral body (VB) fragility. VB bone mineral content (BMC), cross-sectional area (CSA), and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) of the third lumbar vertebrae were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Using engineering principles, we calculated the load per unit CSA (stress), VB strength estimated from vBMD and the ratio of stress to strength (fracture risk index, FRI). Young adult Chinese women and men had a smaller VB with a higher vBMD than their Caucasian counterparts. In each race, women had a smaller VB than men but similar vBMD. From young adulthood ( approximately 30 years) to old age ( approximately 70 years), VB CSA increased more in Chinese than Caucasian women (8.6% vs. 5.8%) and increased less in Chinese than Caucasian men (8.7% vs. 11.8%). Estimated periosteal bone deposited was similar in Chinese and Caucasian women (2.64 vs. 2.63 g, 46% vs. 40% of peak BMC). Estimated endosteal bone lost was similar (3.94 vs. 4.05 g or 68% vs. 62% of peak BMC). As endosteal bone loss exceeded periosteal bone gain, net bone was lost from the VB, but this was similar in Chinese and Caucasian women (1.30 vs. 1.42 g or both lost 22% of peak BMC). For men, Chinese gained less periosteal bone than Caucasians (2.73 vs. 5.05 g or 34% vs. 56% of peak BMC) and lost less endosteal bone (3.07 vs. 5.49 g or 38% vs. 61% of peak BMC), so net bone loss was similar in Chinese and Caucasian men (0.34 vs. 0.44 g, both lost 5% of peak BMC). Comparing sexes, in Chinese, net bone loss was greater in women than in men because of greater endosteal bone loss in women (68% of peak BMC) than men (38% of peak BMC); periosteal bone gain was similar in women and men. In Caucasians, net bone loss was greater in women than men because periosteal bone gain was less in women (40%) than men (56%), endosteal bone loss was similar. The age-related increase in VB CSA reduced VB stress but vBMD decreased so the FRI increased; approximately 25% of elderly Chinese and Caucasian women and approximately 5% of elderly Chinese and Caucasian men had an FRI above unity. The structural basis of bone fragility differs by race and sex. Periosteal apposition plays a pivotal role in determining racial and sex differences in net bone loss, geometry, and strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15869923     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  18 in total

1.  Sexual dimorphism of femoral neck cross-sectional bone geometry in athletes and non-athletes: a hip structural analysis study.

Authors:  Karen Hind; Lisa Gannon; Emma Whatley; Carlton Cooke
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Volumetric bone mineral density at the spine and hip in Chinese American and White women.

Authors:  M D Walker; I Saeed; D J McMahon; J Udesky; G Liu; T Lang; J P Bilezikian
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Functional interactions among morphologic and tissue quality traits define bone quality.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The impact of accurate positioning on measurements made by peripheral QCT in the distal radius.

Authors:  E J Marjanovic; K A Ward; J E Adams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  New advances in imaging osteoporosis and its complications.

Authors:  James F Griffith; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  The ratio of anterior and posterior vertebral heights reinforces the utility of DXA in assessment of vertebrae strength.

Authors:  Grzegorz Tatoń; Eugeniusz Rokita; Mariusz Korkosz; Andrzej Wróbel
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Thinking inside and outside the envelopes of bone: dedicated to PDD.

Authors:  P Szulc; E Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Premenopausal and postmenopausal differences in bone microstructure and mechanical competence in Chinese-American and white women.

Authors:  Marcella D Walker; X Sherry Liu; Bin Zhou; Shivani Agarwal; George Liu; Donald J McMahon; John P Bilezikian; X Edward Guo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  External Bone Size Is a Key Determinant of Strength-Decline Trajectories of Aging Male Radii.

Authors:  Erin Mr Bigelow; Daniella M Patton; Ferrous S Ward; Antonio Ciarelli; Michael Casden; Andrea Clark; Robert W Goulet; Michael D Morris; Stephen H Schlecht; Gurjit S Mandair; Todd L Bredbenner; David H Kohn; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  MMP-13 is one of the critical mediators of the effect of HDAC4 deletion on the skeleton.

Authors:  Teruyo Nakatani; Tiffany Chen; Nicola C Partridge
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.