Literature DB >> 8573417

Evaluation of technical factors affecting the quantification of trabecular bone structure using magnetic resonance imaging.

S Majumdar1, D Newitt, M Jergas, A Gies, E Chiu, D Osman, J Keltner, J Keyak, H Genant.   

Abstract

High resolution magnetic resonance (MR) techniques combined with standard techniques of stereology and texture analysis have been used to quantify trabecular structure. Using dried excised specimens from the tibia (n = 10) and radius (n = 2) we evaluate the impact of using volumetric gradient-echo (GE) and spin-echo (SE) MR imaging sequences, the relative importance of echo time in gradient-echo MR imaging, and the impact of different threshold values to segment the bone and bone marrow on the estimation of trabecular bone structure. We also investigate the inter-relationships between the different structural parameters derived from MR images. Images were obtained using fast gradient-echo and spin-echo imaging sequences, with TE values ranging from 7 to 17 ms using 4.7 and 1.5 Tesla imaging systems. In-plane image resolution ranged from 128 to 156 microns, and slice thickness ranged from 128 to 1000 microns. We derived stereological measures such as the mean intercept length, trabecular width, fractional area of trabecular bone, trabecular number, and trabecular spacing, the fractal dimension as a texture-related parameter and the Euler number as a measure of connectivity from these images. We found that the mean intercept length as a function of angle traced an ellipse with the orientation of the principal axis of the ellipse, a measure of trabecular orientation, identical when measured from the spin-echo or gradient-echo MR images. Absolute measures such as the fractional area, trabecular width, trabecular number, and fractal dimension as measured from gradient echo images were 28%, 30%, 1.3%, and 0.6% greater, respectively, than those calculated from spin-echo images, while the trabecular spacing was 14% less when calculated from gradient-echo images compared to spin-echo images. The structural parameters also depended on the echo time used to obtain the MR image. The choice of the threshold used to segment the high resolution images also affected the estimated structural parameters significantly. Our results indicate that MR may be used to visualize and quantify trabecular bone architecture; however, the different technical factors that could affect the appearance of MR images must be understood and considered in the data analysis and interpretation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8573417     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(95)00263-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  21 in total

1.  In vivo NMR microscopy allows short-term serial assessment of multiple skeletal implications of corticosteroid exposure.

Authors:  Masaya Takahashi; Felix W Wehrli; Luna Hilaire; Babette S Zemel; Scott N Hwang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cross-sectional DXA and MR measures of tibial periarticular bone associate with radiographic knee osteoarthritis severity.

Authors:  G H Lo; A M Tassinari; J B Driban; L L Price; E Schneider; S Majumdar; T E McAlindon
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 6.576

3.  Quantification of trabecular bone structure using magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla--calibration studies using microcomputed tomography as a standard of reference.

Authors:  C A Sell; J N Masi; A Burghardt; D Newitt; T M Link; S Majumdar
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 4.  [New techniques for the diagnosis of osteoporosis].

Authors:  A S Issever; T M Link
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Cylinders or walls? A new computational model to estimate the MR transverse relaxation rate dependence on trabecular bone architecture.

Authors:  Bernd Müller-Bierl; Olivia Louis; Yves Fierens; Nico Buls; Robert Luypaert; Johan de Mey
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure in the distal radius: relationship with X-ray tomographic microscopy and biomechanics.

Authors:  S Majumdar; D Newitt; A Mathur; D Osman; A Gies; E Chiu; J Lotz; J Kinney; H Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  MRI signal-based quantification of subchondral bone at the tibial plateau: a population study.

Authors:  James W MacKay; Keith C Godley; Andoni P Toms
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 8.  Quantitative imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.

Authors:  Sara Guerri; Daniele Mercatelli; Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez; Alessandro Napoli; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Alberto Bazzocchi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

9.  Relationship between trabecular bone structure and articular cartilage morphology and relaxation times in early OA of the knee joint using parallel MRI at 3 T.

Authors:  R I Bolbos; Jin Zuo; Suchandrima Banerjee; Thomas M Link; C Benjamin Ma; Xiaojuan Li; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Trabecular bone structure and spatial differences in articular cartilage MR relaxation times in individuals with posterior horn medial meniscal tears.

Authors:  D Kumar; J Schooler; J Zuo; C E McCulloch; L Nardo; T M Link; X Li; S Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 6.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.