Literature DB >> 15868279

Towards standardization of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the forearm: a common region of interest (ROI) improves the comparability among DXA devices.

S Prevrhal1, Y Lu, H K Genant, J O Toschke, J A Shepherd.   

Abstract

Manufacturer-implemented regions of interest (ROIs) to determine the bone mineral density (BMD) at the forearm are currently not standardized across dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) devices. We hypothesized that their differences introduce considerable variation in measurement results for forearm BMD when taken on different devices, and that a ROIs common to all devices with standardized placement and size significantly improve device comparability. The common ROI was defined to have a fixed length of 2 cm and to extend proximally from the location where the ulna and radius bones superimpose on the DXA image. The effects of universal standardization of forearm BMD were combined with and compared to those of the common ROI. They were drawn on 91 female study participants (ages 20-80 years, 10 per decade) who were scanned on Hologic QDR-4500, Aloka DCS-600EX, GE Lunar PIXI and Norland pDEXA DXA scanners. For all device combinations, manufacturer-implemented ROI root mean-square errors were significantly higher than for the common ROI, suggesting that implementing an ROI with common design on all scanners is a good way to reduce interdevice variability. When manufacturer-implemented ROIs were universally standardized root mean-square error (RMSE) values were less different from that of the nonstandardized Common ROI, suggesting that universal standardization can further improve interdevice comparability even when a common ROI such as the one implemented here is used. ROI standardization dramatically improves interdevice comparability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15868279     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-004-0050-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  6 in total

1.  Variations in morphological and biomechanical indices at the distal radius in subjects with identical BMD.

Authors:  Galateia J Kazakia; Andrew J Burghardt; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  An update on the assessment of osteoporosis using radiologic techniques.

Authors:  John Damilakis; Thomas G Maris; Apostolos H Karantanas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  [Absorptiometry].

Authors:  S Prevrhal
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  The comparability of HR-pQCT bone measurements is improved by scanning anatomically standardized regions.

Authors:  S Bonaretti; S Majumdar; T F Lang; S Khosla; A J Burghardt
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Automated simulation of areal bone mineral density assessment in the distal radius from high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  A J Burghardt; G J Kazakia; T M Link; S Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Premenopausal overweight women do not lose bone during moderate weight loss with adequate or higher calcium intake.

Authors:  Claudia S Riedt; Yvette Schlussel; Nancy von Thun; Hasina Ambia-Sobhan; Theodore Stahl; M Paul Field; Robert M Sherrell; Sue A Shapses
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 7.045

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.