Literature DB >> 10954813

Laparoscopically assisted transsacral resection of rectal cancer with primary anastomosis. A preliminary review.

D W Weaver1, S R Eachempati.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The management of rectal cancer has been changing to include more sphincter-sparing procedures. We report our initial experience with a new technique incorporating laparoscopy and a transsacral approach for low or midlevel rectal cancer. Here, we tried to determine whether this sphincter-sparing method could produce acceptable morbidity and recurrence rates.
METHODS: Patients with rectal cancer 4 to 8 cm from the dentate line underwent laparoscopically-assisted transsacral resection (LTR) with primary anastomosis. With this technique, the rectosigmoid is mobilized via laparoscopy while the patient is in the supine position. Next, the patient is placed in the prone jackknife position, and a segment of rectum is resected by a transsacral approach. Age, estimated blood loss, length of time in the operating room, length of stay, and postoperative complications were noted. Aspects of the tumor pathology regarding stage, lymph nodes, tumor size, and presence of tumor at resection margins also were recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 13 patients, ages 26 to 70 years (mean, 52.5 years), underwent the procedure. No perioperative deaths occurred. The mean hospital stay was 9.6 days. The average size of the rectal lesion was 4.3 cm in the largest dimension. The average specimen contained 11.5 total, and 2.0 metastatic lymph nodes. Postoperative complications included two anastomotic breakdowns and two other wound complications. Late follow-up evaluation ranged from 10 to 30 months, with 11 of 13 patients alive (85% survival). Two local recurrences and three distant recurrences were noted at long-term follow-up assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients with low or midlevel rectal cancer, LTR may be a viable option. Further experience is necessary to define its oncologic efficacy and whether routine temporary diverting colostomy is indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10954813     DOI: 10.1007/s004640020085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  23 in total

1.  Chances of cure are not compromised with sphincter-saving procedures for cancer of the lower third of the rectum.

Authors:  I C Lavery; F Lopez-Kostner; V W Fazio; M Fernandez-Martin; J W Milsom; J M Church
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Trans-sphincteric surgery of the rectum. (with 2 colour plates)

Authors:  A Y Mason
Journal:  Prog Surg       Date:  1974

3.  Laparoscopic colectomy.

Authors:  G A Fielding; J Lumley; L Nathanson; P Hewitt; M Rhodes; R Stitz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Intrarectal and intra-anal ultrasonography in the evaluation of colorectal pathology.

Authors:  A J Senagore
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 5.  Sphincter preservation therapy for distal rectal carcinoma: a review.

Authors:  A K Ng; A Recht; P M Busse
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  An analysis of survival and treatment failure following abdominoperineal and sphincter-saving resection in Dukes' B and C rectal carcinoma. A report of the NSABP clinical trials. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project.

Authors:  N Wolmark; B Fisher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Conservative management of rectal carcinoma: the efficacy of a multimodality approach.

Authors:  J M Jessup; R Bleday; P Busse; G Steele
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb

8.  Postoperative radiotherapy in Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid. A randomized multicenter study.

Authors:  I Balslev; M Pedersen; P S Teglbjaerg; F Hanberg-Soerensen; J Bone; N O Jacobsen; J Overgaard; A Sell; K Bertelsen; E Hage
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Posterior approach to the rectum for treatment of selected benign lesions.

Authors:  A Arnaud; I R Fretes; A Joly; J C Sarles
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy.

Authors:  S D Wexner; S M Cohen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: outcomes in 194 patients and review of the literature.

Authors:  E Bärlehner; T Benhidjeb; S Anders; B Schicke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.