Literature DB >> 14739245

Rapid sequence turnover at an intergenic locus in Drosophila.

Nadia D Singh1, Dmitri A Petrov.   

Abstract

Closely related species of Drosophila tend to have similar genome sizes. The strong imbalance in favor of small deletions relative to insertions implies that the unconstrained DNA in Drosophila is unlikely to be passively inherited from even closely related ancestors, and yet most DNA in Drosophila genomes is intergenic and potentially unconstrained. In an attempt to investigate the maintenance of this intergenic DNA, we studied the evolution of an intergenic locus on the fourth chromosome of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. This 1.2-kb locus is marked by two distinct, large insertion events: a nuclear transposition of a mitochondrial sequence and a transposition of a nonautonomous DNA transposon DNAREP1_DM. Because we could trace the evolutionary histories of these sequences, we were able to reconstruct the length evolution of this region in some detail. We sequenced this locus in all four species of the D. melanogaster species complex: D. melanogaster, D. simulans, D. sechellia, and D. mauritiana. Although this locus is similar in size in these four species, less than 10% of the sequence from the most recent common ancestor remains in D. melanogaster and all of its sister species. This region appears to have increased in size through several distinct insertions in the ancestor of the D. melanogaster species complex and has been shrinking since the split of these lineages. In addition, we found no evidence suggesting that the size of this locus has been maintained over evolutionary time; these results are consistent with the model of a dynamic equilibrium between persistent DNA loss through small deletions and more sporadic DNA gain through less frequent but longer insertions. The apparent stability of genome size in Drosophila may belie very rapid sequence turnover at intergenic loci.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14739245     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msh060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  29 in total

1.  Pervasive epigenetic effects of Drosophila euchromatic transposable elements impact their evolution.

Authors:  Yuh Chwen G Lee; Gary H Karpen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Testing chromosomal phylogenies and inversion breakpoint reuse in Drosophila.

Authors:  Josefa González; Ferran Casals; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Conservation of regulatory sequences and gene expression patterns in the disintegrating Drosophila Hox gene complex.

Authors:  Bárbara Negre; Sònia Casillas; Magali Suzanne; Ernesto Sánchez-Herrero; Michael Akam; Michael Nefedov; Antonio Barbadilla; Pieter de Jong; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Population genomics of transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Dmitri A Petrov; Anna-Sophie Fiston-Lavier; Mikhail Lipatov; Kapa Lenkov; Josefa González
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Genomic heterogeneity of background substitutional patterns in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Peter F Arndt; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genomewide comparative analysis of the highly abundant transposable element DINE-1 suggests a recent transpositional burst in Drosophila yakuba.

Authors:  Hsiao-Pei Yang; Tzu-Ling Hung; Tzung-Lin You; Tzung-Han Yang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Population genomic inferences from sparse high-throughput sequencing of two populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Timothy B Sackton; Rob J Kulathinal; Casey M Bergman; Aaron R Quinlan; Erik B Dopman; Mauricio Carneiro; Gabor T Marth; Daniel L Hartl; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 3.416

8.  High level of structural polymorphism driven by mobile elements in the Hox genomic region of the Chaetognath Spadella cephaloptera.

Authors:  Ferdinand Marlétaz; Gabor Gyapay; Yannick Le Parco
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Strong evidence for lineage and sequence specificity of substitution rates and patterns in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Peter F Arndt; Andrew G Clark; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Hawaiian Drosophila genomes: size variation and evolutionary expansions.

Authors:  Elysse M Craddock; Joseph G Gall; Mark Jonas
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 1.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.