Literature DB >> 15864488

[Mechatronic in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. First experiences with the daVinci Telemanipulatory System].

G Strauss1, D Winkler, S Jacobs, C Trantakis, A Dietz, F Bootz, J Meixensberger, V Falk.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study examines the advantages and disadvantages of a commercial telemanipulator system (daVinci, Intuitive Surgical, USA) with computer-guided instruments in functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS).
METHODS: We performed five different surgical FESS steps on 14 anatomical preparation and compared them with conventional FESS. A total of 140 procedures were examined taking into account the following parameters: degrees of freedom (DOF), duration , learning curve, force feedback, human-machine-interface.
RESULTS: Telemanipulatory instruments have more DOF available then conventional instrumentation in FESS. The average time consumed by configuration of the telemanipulator is around 9+/-2 min. Missing force feedback is evaluated mainly as a disadvantage of the telemanipulator. Scaling was evaluated as helpful. The ergonomic concept seems to be better than the conventional solution. DISCUSSION: Computer guided instruments showed better results for the available DOF of the instruments. The human-machine-interface is more adaptable and variable then in conventional instrumentation. Motion scaling and indexing are characteristics of the telemanipulator concept which are helpful for FESS in our study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15864488     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-005-1242-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  35 in total

1.  Robotics and telemanipulation technologies for endoscopic surgery. A review of the ARTEMIS project. Advanced Robotic Telemanipulator for Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  M O Schurr; G Buess; B Neisius; U Voges
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Robotics and systems technology for advanced endoscopic procedures: experiences in general surgery.

Authors:  M O Schurr; A Arezzo; G F Buess
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 3.  Present state and future perspectives of computer aided surgery in the field of ENT and skull base.

Authors:  Marco Caversaccio; Lutz-Peter Nolte; Rudolf Häusler
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg       Date:  2002

4.  [Applications for a robot in the lateral skull base. Evaluation of robot-assisted mastoidectomy in an anatomic specimen].

Authors:  P K Plinkert; B Plinkert; A Hiller; J Stallkamp
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 5.  [Thorascopic coronary surgery. Current status and future perspectives].

Authors:  S Jacobs; V Falk; J Onnasch; F W Mohr
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Effect of the angle between the optical axis of the endoscope and the instruments' plane on monitor image and surgical performance.

Authors:  P V Patil; G B Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Surgical application of a new robotic system for paranasal sinus surgery.

Authors:  Helmut Steinhart; Klaus Bumm; Jochen Wurm; Michael Vogele; Heinrich Iro
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 8.  [Computer-assisted surgery in the ENT specialty. Developments and experiences from the first decade].

Authors:  L Klimek; R Mösges
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.057

9.  [CAS (computer assisted surgery). A new procedure in head and neck surgery].

Authors:  G Schlöndorff; R Mösges; D Meyer-Ebrecht; W Krybus; L Adams
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  Basics of robotics and manipulators in endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  H H Rininsland
Journal:  Endosc Surg Allied Technol       Date:  1993-06
View more
  8 in total

1.  [Use of a mechatronic robotic camera holding system in head and neck surgery].

Authors:  J Kristin; R Geiger; F B Knapp; J Schipper; T Klenzner
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Development of a new endoscope holder for head and neck surgery--from the technical design concept to implementation.

Authors:  Julia Kristin; Armin Kolmer; Peter Kraus; Robert Geiger; Thomas Klenzner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  [A surgical micromanipulator in ear surgery: potential and comparison to freehand preparation].

Authors:  M Hofer; A Runge; R Haase; T Neumuth; T Maier; T Lueth; A Dietz; G Strauss
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  [12 years of Computer-Aided Surgery around the Head : Developments in surgical planning and simulation from a Bern perspective].

Authors:  W Wimmer; N Gerber; S Weber; L-P Nolte; M Caversaccio
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  The HD-Panoramic Visualization System: a new visualization system for ENT surgery.

Authors:  G Strauss; N Bahrami; M Hofer; E Dittrich; M Strauss; A Dietz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  [A new visualization device for ENT surgery : the panoramic visualization system (HD-PVS)].

Authors:  G Strauss; M Hofer; N Bahrami; E Dittrich; M Strauss; A Dietz
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  [Clinical use of a micromanipulator system: preliminary clinical experience in middle ear surgery].

Authors:  G Strauss; T Maier; M Krinninger; T Berger; A Dietz; T Lüth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Image-guided surgery and medical robotics in the cranial area.

Authors:  G Widmann
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2007-01-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.