Literature DB >> 20573622

Condition-dependent ejaculate size and composition in a ladybird beetle.

Jennifer C Perry1, Locke Rowe.   

Abstract

Sexually selected male ejaculate traits are expected to depend on the resource state of males. Theory predicts that males in good condition will produce larger ejaculates, but that ejaculate composition will depend on the relative production costs of ejaculate components and the risk of sperm competition experienced by low- and high-condition males. Under some conditions, when low condition leads to poorer performance in sperm competition, males in low condition may produce ejaculates with higher sperm content relative to their total ejaculate and may even transfer more sperm than high-condition males in an absolute sense. Previous studies in insects have shown that males in good condition transfer larger ejaculates or more sperm, but it has not been clear whether increased sperm content represents a shift in allocation or simply a larger ejaculate, and thus the condition dependence of ejaculate composition has been largely untested. We examined condition dependence in ejaculate by manipulating adult male condition in a ladybird beetle (Adalia bipunctata) in which males transfer three distinct ejaculate components during mating: sperm, non-sperm ejaculate retained within the female reproductive tract, and a spermatophore capsule that females eject and ingest following mating. We found that high condition males indeed transferred larger ejaculates, potentially achieved by an increased rate of ejaculate transfer, and allocated less to sperm compared with low-condition males. Low-condition males transferred ejaculates with absolutely and proportionally more sperm. This study provides the first experimental evidence for a condition-dependent shift in ejaculate composition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20573622      PMCID: PMC2982242          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  24 in total

1.  Older males signal more reliably.

Authors:  Stephen R Proulx; Troy Day; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The evolution of sperm-allocation strategies and the degree of sperm competition.

Authors:  Paul D Williams; Troy Day; Erin Cameron
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  A review of the physical and chemical properties of human semen and the formulation of a semen simulant.

Authors:  Derek H Owen; David F Katz
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

4.  Sexual selection, genetic architecture, and the condition dependence of body shape in the sexually dimorphic fly Prochyliza xanthostoma (Piophilidae).

Authors:  Russell Bonduriansky; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Sexually selected signals are not similar to sports handicaps.

Authors:  Thomas Getty
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Sexual selection and the adaptive evolution of mammalian ejaculate proteins.

Authors:  Steven A Ramm; Peter L Oliver; Chris P Ponting; Paula Stockley; Richard D Emes
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculate composition.

Authors:  Erin Cameron; Troy Day; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Sexual selection by cryptic female choice on male seminal products - a new bridge between sexual selection and reproductive physiology.

Authors:  W G Eberhard; C Cordero
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 17.712

9.  Male fecundity stimulation: conflict and cooperation within and between the sexes: model analyses and coevolutionary dynamics.

Authors:  Suzanne H Alonzo; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 10.  Postcopulatory sexual selection: Darwin's omission and its consequences.

Authors:  William G Eberhard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  26 in total

1.  Protein-specific manipulation of ejaculate composition in response to female mating status in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Laura K Sirot; Mariana F Wolfner; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Epigenetic paternal effects as costly, condition-dependent traits.

Authors:  Erin L Macartney; Angela J Crean; Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 3.  The sperm factor: paternal impact beyond genes.

Authors:  Simone Immler
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Multiple biological mechanisms result in correlations between pre- and post-mating traits that differ among versus within individuals and genotypes.

Authors:  Cristina Tuni; Chang S Han; Niels J Dingemanse
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  DNA repair pathway choice is influenced by the health of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Alethea D Wang; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Seminal fluid and accessory male investment in sperm competition.

Authors:  Steven A Ramm
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  The role of oxidative stress in postcopulatory selection.

Authors:  Christopher R Friesen; Daniel W A Noble; Mats Olsson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Protein and carbohydrate intake influence sperm number and fertility in male cockroaches, but not sperm viability.

Authors:  Harriet Bunning; James Rapkin; Laurence Belcher; C Ruth Archer; Kim Jensen; John Hunt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The seminal symphony: how to compose an ejaculate.

Authors:  Jennifer C Perry; Laura Sirot; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 17.712

10.  Exposure to sperm competition risk improves survival of virgin males.

Authors:  Joshua P Moatt; Calvin Dytham; Michael D F Thom
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.