Literature DB >> 15856212

Perceiving a stable world during active rotational and translational head movements.

P M Jaekl1, M R Jenkin, Laurence R Harris.   

Abstract

When a person moves through the world, the associated visual displacement of the environment in the opposite direction is not usually seen as external movement but rather as a changing view of a stable world. We measured the amount of visual motion that can be tolerated as compatible with the perception of moving within a stable world during active, sinusoidal, translational and rotational head movement. Head movements were monitored by means of a low-latency, mechanical head tracker and the information was used to update a helmet-mounted visual display. A variable gain was introduced between the head tracker and the display. Ten subjects adjusted this gain until the visual display appeared stable during sinusoidal yaw, pitch and roll head rotations and naso-occipital, inter-aural and dorso-ventral translations at 0.5 Hz. Each head movement was tested with movement either orthogonal to or parallel with gravity. A wide spread of gains was accepted as stable (0.8 to 1.4 for rotation and 1.1 to 1.8 for translation). The gain most likely to be perceived as stable was greater than that required by the geometry (1.2 for rotation; 1.4 for translation). For rotational motion, the mean gains were the same for all axes. For translation there was no effect of whether the movement was inter-aural (mean gain 1.6) or dorso-ventral (mean gain 1.5) and no effect of the relative orientation of the translation direction relative to gravity. However translation in the naso-occipital direction was associated with more closely veridical settings (mean gain 1.1) and narrower standard deviations than in other directions. These findings are discussed in terms of visual and non-visual contributions to the perception of an earth-stable environment during active head movement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Neuroscience; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15856212     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2191-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Eye-position dependence of torsional velocity during interaural translation, horizontal pursuit, and yaw-axis rotation in humans.

Authors:  M F Walker; M Shelhamer; D S Zee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Sensitivity to relative and absolute motion.

Authors:  R J Snowden
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  An acceleration illusion caused by underestimation of stimulus velocity during pursuit eye movements: Aubert-Fleischl revisited.

Authors:  A H Wertheim; P Van Gelder
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 4.  Pain mechanisms: a new theory.

Authors:  R Melzack; P D Wall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-11-19       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Perceiving a stable environment when one moves.

Authors:  H Wallach
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 24.137

6.  Visual and nonvisual contributions to perceived ego-motion studied with a new psychophysical method.

Authors:  B S Mesland; A H Wertheim
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Analysis of human vestibulo-ocular reflex during active head movements.

Authors:  R D Tomlinson; G E Saunders; D W Schwarz
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1980 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  Effects of reference lines on displacement thresholds at various durations of movement.

Authors:  C A Johnson; R P Scobey
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Eye movements induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) at small angles of tilt.

Authors:  C Darlot; P Denise; J Droulez; B Cohen; A Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Human eye movement response to z-axis linear acceleration: the effect of varying the phase relationships between visual and vestibular inputs.

Authors:  C E Lathan; C Wall; L R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  10 in total

1.  Human spatial orientation in non-stationary environments: relation between self-turning perception and detection of surround motion.

Authors:  Reinhart Jürgens; Wolfgang Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Towards dynamic modeling of visual-vestibular conflict detection.

Authors:  Isabelle T Garzorz; Paul R MacNeilage
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.453

3.  The role of attention on the integration of visual and inertial cues.

Authors:  Daniel R Berger; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Mathematical requirements of visual-vestibular integration.

Authors:  Douglas A Hanes
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Humans do not have direct access to retinal flow during walking.

Authors:  Jan L Souman; Tom C A Freeman; Verena Eikmeier; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Scene-Motion Thresholds During Head Yaw for Immersive Virtual Environments.

Authors:  Jason Jerald; Mary Whitton; Frederick P Brooks
Journal:  ACM Trans Appl Percept       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.550

7.  Perceived surface slant is systematically biased in the actively-generated optic flow.

Authors:  Carlo Fantoni; Corrado Caudek; Fulvio Domini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Don't worry, be active: how to facilitate the detection of errors in immersive virtual environments.

Authors:  Sara Rigutti; Marta Stragà; Marco Jez; Giulio Baldassi; Andrea Carnaghi; Piero Miceu; Carlo Fantoni
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Age-related changes to vestibular heave and pitch perception and associations with postural control.

Authors:  Grace A Gabriel; Laurence R Harris; Joshua J Gnanasegaram; Sharon L Cushing; Karen A Gordon; Bruce C Haycock; Jennifer L Campos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  Visual stability-what is the problem?

Authors:  Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.