Literature DB >> 31239138

Towards dynamic modeling of visual-vestibular conflict detection.

Isabelle T Garzorz1, Paul R MacNeilage2.   

Abstract

Visual-vestibular mismatch is a common occurrence, with causes ranging from vehicular travel, to vestibular dysfunction, to virtual reality displays. Behavioral and physiological consequences of this mismatch include adaptation of reflexive eye movements, oscillopsia, vertigo, and nausea. Despite this significance, we still do not have a good understanding of how the nervous system evaluates visual-vestibular conflict. Here we review research that quantifies perceptual sensitivity to visual-vestibular conflict and factors that mediate this sensitivity, such as noise on visual and vestibular sensory estimates. We emphasize that dynamic modeling methods are necessary to investigate how the nervous system monitors conflict between time-varying visual and vestibular signals, and we present a simple example of a drift-diffusion model for visual-vestibular conflict detection. The model makes predictions for detection of conflict arising from changes in both visual gain and latency. We conclude with discussion of topics for future research.
© 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conflict; Decision making; Drift-diffusion; Oculomotor; Optic flow; Oscillopsia; Perception; Perceptual stability; Psychophysics; Vestibular

Year:  2019        PMID: 31239138      PMCID: PMC7162554          DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.03.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  11 in total

Review 1.  Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions.

Authors:  Philip L Smith; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Oculomotor cerebellum.

Authors:  Jan Voogd; Neal H Barmack
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.453

3.  Perceiving a stable world during active rotational and translational head movements.

Authors:  P M Jaekl; M R Jenkin; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

5.  Perceptual scaling of visual and inertial cues: effects of field of view, image size, depth cues, and degree of freedom.

Authors:  B J Correia Grácio; J E Bos; M M van Paassen; M Mulder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Signals and learning rules guiding oculomotor plasticity.

Authors:  Soon-Lim Shin; Grace Q Zhao; Jennifer L Raymond
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Perceiving a stable environment when one moves.

Authors:  H Wallach
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 24.137

8.  Scene-Motion Thresholds During Head Yaw for Immersive Virtual Environments.

Authors:  Jason Jerald; Mary Whitton; Frederick P Brooks
Journal:  ACM Trans Appl Percept       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.550

9.  Visual-Vestibular Conflict Detection Depends on Fixation.

Authors:  Isabelle T Garzorz; Paul R MacNeilage
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 10.  Consensus paper: the role of the cerebellum in perceptual processes.

Authors:  Oliver Baumann; Ronald J Borra; James M Bower; Kathleen E Cullen; Christophe Habas; Richard B Ivry; Maria Leggio; Jason B Mattingley; Marco Molinari; Eric A Moulton; Michael G Paulin; Marina A Pavlova; Jeremy D Schmahmann; Arseny A Sokolov
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.847

View more
  1 in total

1.  When gravity is not where it should be: How perceived orientation affects visual self-motion processing.

Authors:  Meaghan McManus; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.