Literature DB >> 15855975

EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a learning curve with 300 consecutive procedures.

Mohamad A Eloubeidi1, Ashutosh Tamhane.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of our study was to assess a single operator's learning curve with regard to the number of passes, the diagnostic accuracy, and the complications associated with EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses.
METHODS: The number of passes, the diagnostic accuracy, and the complication rate were prospectively evaluated in 300 consecutive EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic masses performed by a single endosonographer over a 3-year period. The procedures were placed into 3 groups, which contained 100 procedures each. The endosonographer had undergone a third-tier EUS fellowship and had performed 45 supervised pancreatic EUS-FNA during his training.
RESULTS: Of the 300 EUS-FNA performed (median age 63 years, 64% men), no statistically significant differences among the 3 groups with regard to age, gender, race, location, or size of the mass were found. Diagnostic accuracy of the EUS-FNA procedure was similar over time (Group 1, 92%; Group 2, 92%; Group 3, 95%). Median number of passes showed a decreasing trend over the 3-year study period, despite an increasing trend of the number of procedures performed (r = -0.14, p = 0.42). The median number of passes was lower for Group 2 (median, 3; p = 0.02) and Group 3 (median, 3; p = 0.003) compared with Group 1 (median, 4). Group 3 (7/100, 7%) was less likely to encounter complications compared with Group 1 (13/100, 13%; p = 0.24) and Group 2 (18/100, 18%; p = 0.03). Frequency of serious complications was similar across the 3 groups (1%-3%).
CONCLUSIONS: With adequate third-tier training, a newly developed EUS program can achieve safe and accurate results of EUS-FNA of the pancreas. The learning curve, however, needs to continue after the fellowship, because more procedures are needed for one to gain proficiency and efficiency with EUS-FNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15855975     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(05)00363-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  53 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic evaluation of solid pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Tokar; Rohit Walia
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-10

Review 2.  Applications of EUS for the molecular characterization and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases--a review of the recent medical literature.

Authors:  Manoop S Bhutani
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2005-05-10

3.  Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of non-pancreatic lesions: an institutional experience.

Authors:  Dipti Anand; Julieta E Barroeta; Prabodh K Gupta; Michael Kochman; Zubair W Baloch
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Web-based system for training and dissemination of a magnification chromoendoscopy classification.

Authors:  Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Ricardo Correia; Cristina Santos; Sonia Fernandes; Ernesto Palhares; Rui-Almeida Silva; Pedro Amaro; Miguel Areia; Altamiro Costa-Pereira; Luis Moreira-Dias
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Is it time to take a pass on the increased number of passes in EUS-FNA?

Authors:  Shantel Hébert-Magee; Robert H Hawes; Shyam Varadarajulu
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  Endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of pancreatic neoplasms-solid and cystic: A review.

Authors:  Eric M Nelsen; Darya Buehler; Anurag V Soni; Deepak V Gopal
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-16

Review 7.  Rapid on-site evaluation increases endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration adequacy for pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Robert L Schmidt; Benjamin L Witt; Anna P Matynia; Gonzalo Barraza; Lester J Layfield; Douglas G Adler
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration characteristics of primary adenocarcinoma versus other malignant neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  Veronika Gagovic; Bret J Spier; Ryan J DeLee; Courtney Barancin; Mary Lindstrom; Michael Einstein; Siobhan Byrne; Josephine Harter; Rashmi Agni; Patrick R Pfau; Terrence J Frick; Anurag Soni; Deepak V Gopal
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.522

9.  Performance of EUS-FNA for mediastinal lymphadenopathy: impact on patient management and costs in low-volume EUS centers.

Authors:  Meike M C Hirdes; Matthijs P Schwartz; Kristien M A J Tytgat; Noël J Schlösser; Daisy M D S Sie-Go; Menno A Brink; Bas Oldenburg; Peter D Siersema; Frank P Vleggaar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic masses with rapid on-site cytological evaluation by endosonographers without attendance of cytopathologists.

Authors:  Takuto Hikichi; Atsushi Irisawa; Manoop S Bhutani; Tadayuki Takagi; Goro Shibukawa; Go Yamamoto; Takeru Wakatsuki; Hidemichi Imamura; Yuta Takahashi; Ai Sato; Masaki Sato; Tsunehiko Ikeda; Yuko Hashimoto; Kazuhiro Tasaki; Kazuo Watanabe; Hiromasa Ohira; Katsutoshi Obara
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 7.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.