Literature DB >> 25901210

Endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of pancreatic neoplasms-solid and cystic: A review.

Eric M Nelsen1, Darya Buehler1, Anurag V Soni1, Deepak V Gopal1.   

Abstract

Pancreatic neoplasms have a wide range of pathology, from pancreatic adenocarcinoma to cystic mucinous neoplasms. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with or without fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a helpful diagnostic tool in the work-up of pancreatic neoplasms. Its utility in pancreatic malignancy is well known. Over the last two decades EUS-FNA has become a procedure of choice for diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. EUS-FNA is highly sensitive and specific for solid lesions, with sensitivities as high as 80%-95% for pancreatic masses and specificity as high as 75%-100%. Multiple aspects of the procedure have been studied to optimize the rate of diagnosis with EUS-FNA including cytopathologist involvement, needle size, suctioning and experience of endoscopist. Onsite pathology is one of the most important elements in increasing diagnostic yield rate in EUS-FNA. EUS-FNA is valuable in diagnosing rare and atypical pancreatic neoplasms including neuroendocrine, lymphoma and metastatic disease. As more and more patients undergo cross sectional imaging, cystic lesions of the pancreas are becoming a more common occurrence and EUS-FNA of these lesions can be helpful for differentiation. This review covers the technical aspects of optimizing pancreatic neoplasm diagnosis rate, highlight rare pancreatic neoplasms and role of EUS-FNA, and also outline the important factors in diagnosis of cystic lesions by EUS-FNA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration; Pancreatic adenocarcinoma; Pancreatic cysts; Pancreatic neoplasms; Review

Year:  2015        PMID: 25901210      PMCID: PMC4400620          DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i4.318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc


  61 in total

Review 1.  Cyst fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions: a pooled analysis.

Authors:  Laurens A van der Waaij; Hendrik M van Dullemen; Robert J Porte
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Julio Iglesias-Garcia; J Enrique Dominguez-Munoz; Ihab Abdulkader; Jose Larino-Noia; Elena Eugenyeva; Antonio Lozano-Leon; Jeronimo Forteza-Vila
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  John Dewitt; Benedict M Devereaux; Glen A Lehman; Stuart Sherman; Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  Lower frequency of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with pancreatic cancer diagnosed by EUS-guided FNA vs. percutaneous FNA.

Authors:  Carlos Micames; Paul S Jowell; Rebekah White; Erik Paulson; Rendon Nelson; Michael Morse; Herbert Hurwitz; Theodore Pappas; Douglas Tyler; Kevin McGrath
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration characteristics of primary adenocarcinoma versus other malignant neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  Veronika Gagovic; Bret J Spier; Ryan J DeLee; Courtney Barancin; Mary Lindstrom; Michael Einstein; Siobhan Byrne; Josephine Harter; Rashmi Agni; Patrick R Pfau; Terrence J Frick; Anurag Soni; Deepak V Gopal
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.522

6.  Utility of a repeated EUS at a tertiary-referral center.

Authors:  John DeWitt; Kathleen McGreevy; Stuart Sherman; Julia LeBlanc
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas is not an aggressive entity: lessons from 163 resected patients.

Authors:  Stefano Crippa; Roberto Salvia; Andrew L Warshaw; Ismael Domínguez; Claudio Bassi; Massimo Falconi; Sarah P Thayer; Giuseppe Zamboni; Gregory Y Lauwers; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Paola Capelli; Paolo Pederzoli; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Randomized controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle sampling with or without suction for better cytological diagnosis.

Authors:  Rajesh Puri; Peter Vilmann; Adrian Săftoiu; Birgit Guldhammer Skov; Dorte Linnemann; Hazem Hassan; Elymir Soraya Galvis Garcia; Florin Gorunescu
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  A prospective evaluation of an algorithm incorporating routine preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in suspected pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Mohamad A Eloubeidi; Shyam Varadarajulu; Shilpa Desai; Rhett Shirley; Martin J Heslin; Mohit Mehra; Juan P Arnoletti; Isam Eltoum; Charles M Wilcox; Selwyn M Vickers
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Pancreatic cancer--EUS and early diagnosis.

Authors:  Lars Helmstaedter; Juergen Ferdinand Riemann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 3.445

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  How to measure quality in endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Antonio Facciorusso; Rosario Vincenzo Buccino; Nicola Muscatiello
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-07

2.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions with 22 versus 25 Gauge needles: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Antonio Facciorusso; Elisa Stasi; Marianna Di Maso; Gaetano Serviddio; Mohammed Salah Ali Hussein; Nicola Muscatiello
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.623

3.  Comparison of Native Aspirates and Cytological Smears Obtained by EUS-Guided Biopsies for Effective DNA/RNA Marker Testing in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Lucie Benesova; Tereza Halkova; Bohus Bunganic; Barbora Belsanova; Miroslav Zavoral; Eva Traboulsi; Marek Minarik
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 4.  Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Lesions: A Systematic Review of Technical and Procedural Variables.

Authors:  Bhairvi S Jani; Fadi Rzouq; Shreyas Saligram; Diego Lim; Amit Rastogi; John Bonino; Mojtaba Olyaee
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2016-01

Review 5.  Can endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy replace fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic and mediastinal diseases?

Authors:  Jintao Guo; Manoop S Bhutani; Marc Giovannini; Zhaoshen Li; Zhendong Jin; Aiming Yang; Guoqiang Xu; Guiqi Wang; Siyu Sun
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.628

6.  Prospective evaluation of EUS-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic mass lesions.

Authors:  M H Larsen; C W Fristrup; S Detlefsen; M B Mortensen
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-02-07

7.  Morphological differentiation and follow-up of pancreatic cystic neoplasms using endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Susumu Hijioka; Kazuo Hara; Nobumasa Mizuno; Hiroshi Imaoka; Vikram Bhatia; Kenji Yamao
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 5.628

8.  How to prepare, handle, read, and improve EUS-FNA and fine-needle biopsy for solid pancreatic lesions: The pathologist's role.

Authors:  Katharina Biermann; María Dolores Lozano Escario; Shantel Hébert-Magee; Guido Rindi; Claudio Doglioni
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.628

9.  Endoscopic Ultrasound: Reaching Where Others Can't.

Authors:  Fady G Haddad; Magda Daoud; Ying Liu; Sherif Andrawes
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-04-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.