Literature DB >> 15843909

[Indication for removal of tibial nails].

T Gösling1, T Hüfner, S Hankemeier, U Müller, M Richter, C Krettek.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tibial nail removal has been suggested as a routine procedure for both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The aim of this study was to define guidelines for the removal of tibial nails. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study on the isolated removal of 69 tibial nails after fracture consolidation was done. A review of the patient charts and radiographs was performed. Forty-four patients (64%) were available for the follow-up interview.
RESULTS: Preoperatively, 26 patients (59%) had local complaints. Of these 26 patients, 73% reported an improvement, and 8% reported an aggravation of their local complaints. Of the 18 patients who were asymptomatic before surgery, 17% reported long-term complaints at follow-up.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that routine removal of tibial nails should be discussed critically in asymptomatic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15843909     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-005-1027-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  17 in total

Review 1.  Reamed intramedullary tibial nailing: an overview and analysis of 1106 cases.

Authors:  C M Court-Brown
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  Osteosarcoma associated with a metal implant.

Authors:  K Kumar
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Removal of intramedullary nails from the femur: a review of 45 cases.

Authors:  A Husain; A N Pollak; H D Moehring; S A Olson; M W Chapman
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Interlocking nailing of complex fractures of the femur and tibia.

Authors:  K W Klemm; M Börner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Is routine removal of intramedullary nails justified.

Authors:  T O Boerger; G Patel; J P Murphy
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  [Prospective study of the significance of contact sensitization caused by metal implants].

Authors:  H W Duchna; U Nowack; R Merget; G Muhr; G Schultze-Werninghaus
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 0.942

7.  Femoral nail removal should be restricted in asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  Thomas Gösling; Tobias Hufner; Stefan Hankemeier; Boris A Zelle; Assia Muller-Heine; Christian Krettek
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Part III: Long-term effects of static interlocking fixation.

Authors:  R J Brumback; T S Ellison; A Poka; G H Bathon; A R Burgess
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Influence of materials for fixation implants on local infection. An experimental study of steel versus titanium DCP in rabbits.

Authors:  S Arens; U Schlegel; G Printzen; W J Ziegler; S M Perren; M Hansis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-07

10.  Removal of intramedullary rods after femoral shaft fracture.

Authors:  R Miller; S E Renwick; T A DeCoster; P Shonnard; F Jabczenski
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.512

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  [Implant removal after intramedullary osteosyntheses. Literature review, technical details, and tips and tricks].

Authors:  C Krettek; P Mommsen
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Intramedullary nail removal in the upper and lower limbs. Should we recommend this operation?].

Authors:  K Hora; K P Vorderwinkler; V Vécsei; C Gäbler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Indications for implant removal after fracture healing: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D I Vos; M H J Verhofstad
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Implant removal of osteosynthesis: the Dutch practice. Results of a survey.

Authors:  Dagmar Vos; Beate Hanson; Michiel Verhofstad
Journal:  J Trauma Manag Outcomes       Date:  2012-08-03

5.  Surgeons' beliefs and perceptions about removal of orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  Beate Hanson; Chris van der Werken; Dirk Stengel
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Complications during removal of stainless steel versus titanium nails used for intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal fractures of the tibia.

Authors:  Mustafa Seyhan; Olcay Guler; Mahir Mahirogullari; Ferdi Donmez; Arel Gereli; Serhat Mutlu
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-01-09

Review 7.  Elective removal vs. retaining of hardware after osteosynthesis in asymptomatic patients-a scoping review.

Authors:  Barbara Prediger; Tim Mathes; Christian Probst; Dawid Pieper
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-10-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.