Literature DB >> 10476274

Is routine removal of intramedullary nails justified.

T O Boerger1, G Patel, J P Murphy.   

Abstract

This study investigates the outcome of 100 cases of lower limb intramedullary nail removal. 12 femoral and 25 tibial nails were removed for pain and 4 tibial nails for infection. For 22 tibial nails and 38 femoral nails there was no recorded indication. There where 3 operative complications, 2 abandoned procedures and 1 tibial fracture (nail extraction without prior removal of the distal locking screw). In 9 out of 16 cases anterior knee pain improved after tibial nail removal. 4 patients, previously asymptomatic, developed anterior knee pain following tibial nail removal. 40 patients who were discharged without crutches returned in pain and had to be given crutches to alleviate leg pain. 62 patients took a mean of 11 days sick leave. We conclude that all complications were avoidable. Intramedullary nail removal is safe. Patients with anterior knee pain should be told that their pain may persist and that knee pain may even arise. Most patients will require crutches and an average of 2 weeks away from work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10476274     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(98)00200-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of low, multidirectional locked nailing and plating in the treatment of distal tibial metadiaphyseal fractures.

Authors:  Yong Li; Lei Liu; Xin Tang; Fuxing Pei; Guanglin Wang; Yue Fang; Hui Zhang; Nicolas Crook
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Incidence of intramedullary nail removal after femoral shaft fracture healing.

Authors:  Catherine Hui; Ian Jorgensen; Richard Buckley; Gordon Fick
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 3.  [Implant removal after intramedullary osteosyntheses. Literature review, technical details, and tips and tricks].

Authors:  C Krettek; P Mommsen
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  [Indication for removal of tibial nails].

Authors:  T Gösling; T Hüfner; S Hankemeier; U Müller; M Richter; C Krettek
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Hardware removal after tibial fracture has healed.

Authors:  Adam Sidky; Richard E Buckley
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Effectiveness of orthopedic implant removal surgery in patients with no implant-related symptoms after fracture union of isolated lower extremity shaft fractures: patient-centered evaluation.

Authors:  Sangbong Ko; Jaejun Lee; Junho Nam
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Difficulties in removing ACE tibial intramedullary nail.

Authors:  Gun-Il Im; Kee-Byung Lee
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  [Intramedullary nail removal in the upper and lower limbs. Should we recommend this operation?].

Authors:  K Hora; K P Vorderwinkler; V Vécsei; C Gäbler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Indications for implant removal after fracture healing: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D I Vos; M H J Verhofstad
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.693

10.  Difference in Pain, Complication Rates, and Clinical Outcomes After Suprapatellar Versus Infrapatellar Nailing for Tibia Fractures? A Systematic Review of 1447 Patients.

Authors:  Nils Jan Bleeker; Inge H F Reininga; Bryan J M van de Wall; Laurent A M Hendrickx; Frank J P Beeres; Kaj Ten Duis; Job N Doornberg; Ruurd L Jaarsma; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; Frank F A IJpma
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 2.512

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.