Literature DB >> 18512039

[Intramedullary nail removal in the upper and lower limbs. Should we recommend this operation?].

K Hora1, K P Vorderwinkler, V Vécsei, C Gäbler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Absolute indications for removing intramedullary locking nails (ILN) are undisputed, but there are also relative indications when implant removal might be discussed. The aim of our study was to evaluate complications of ILN removal in the upper and lower extremities.
METHODS: Four hundred sixty (460) patients who underwent interlocking nail removal were reviewed regarding complications after removal of implants in the humerus, femur, or tibia.
RESULTS: The most common complications were delayed wound healing and wound infections. For the humerus, the complication rate of implant removals due to absolute indication was 29%, and the rate for removals due to relative indication was 12%. In the forearm, no complications were seen. Patients who underwent ILN removal in the femur or tibia for absolute indication had a 21% complication rate; the complication rate in patients with relative indication was 10%.
CONCLUSION: The complication rate of interlocking nail removal is too high to justify such a procedure without clear indication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18512039     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-008-1450-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  27 in total

1.  [Removal of a broken massive tibial intramedullary nail].

Authors:  A J Frima; A J Karthaus
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Technique for removing a bent intramedullary femoral nail: a case report.

Authors:  H Ohtsuka; K Yokoyama; M Tonegawa; K Higashi; M Itoman
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  Complications of metalwork removal.

Authors:  P L Sanderson; W Ryan; P G Turner
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  Comminuted refracture of the distal femur and condyles in patients with an intramedullary nail: a report of 5 cases.

Authors:  R K Sen; A Gul; S Aggarwal; S R Kumar; O N Nagi
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.118

5.  Management of a refracture of the femoral shaft with a bent intramedullary nail in situ.

Authors:  P Nicholson; J Rice; J Curtin
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Difficulty in removal of certain intramedullary nails.

Authors:  D Seligson; P A Howard; R Martin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  [Problems of implant removal].

Authors:  G Küntscher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Removal of metal implants after fracture surgery--indications and complications.

Authors:  R M Brown; E F Wheelwright; J Chalmers
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1993-04

9.  Routine implant removal after fracture surgery: a potentially reducible consumer of hospital resources in trauma units.

Authors:  O Böstman; H Pihlajamäki
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1996-11

10.  Femoral nail removal should be restricted in asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  Thomas Gösling; Tobias Hufner; Stefan Hankemeier; Boris A Zelle; Assia Muller-Heine; Christian Krettek
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Implant removal after intramedullary osteosyntheses. Literature review, technical details, and tips and tricks].

Authors:  C Krettek; P Mommsen
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.000

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.