Literature DB >> 15232453

Femoral nail removal should be restricted in asymptomatic patients.

Thomas Gösling1, Tobias Hufner, Stefan Hankemeier, Boris A Zelle, Assia Muller-Heine, Christian Krettek.   

Abstract

Femoral nail removal has been suggested as a routine procedure for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether asymptomatic patients have long-term complaints after femoral nail removal. Additionally, factors that might extend operation time and effect soft tissue healing negatively were analyzed. A retrospective study on the removal of 164 femoral nails after fracture consolidation was done. A review of the patient charts and radiographs was done. Neither the interval between nail implantation and nail removal or the use of an end-cap significantly influenced the operation time. The surgeon's qualification and nail depth were the only variables that influenced operation time. Neither operation time, nail depth, surgeon's qualification, nor the grade of heterotopic ossification significantly influenced the incidence of wound healing problems. One hundred nine patients (73%) were available for the followup interview. Preoperatively, 58 patients (53%) had local complaints. Of these 58 patients, 78% reported improvement and 7% reported an aggravation of their local complaints. Of the 51 patients who were asymptomatic before surgery, 20% reported long-term complaints at followup. Only symptomatic patients should be considered for femoral nail removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15232453     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000130208.90879.67

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  10 in total

1.  A new technique for removal of an incarcerated expandable femoral nail.

Authors:  Emmanouil Liodakis; Christian Krettek; Mohamed Kenawey; Stefan Hankemeier
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  [Implant removal after intramedullary osteosyntheses. Literature review, technical details, and tips and tricks].

Authors:  C Krettek; P Mommsen
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  [Indication for removal of tibial nails].

Authors:  T Gösling; T Hüfner; S Hankemeier; U Müller; M Richter; C Krettek
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  [Intramedullary nail removal in the upper and lower limbs. Should we recommend this operation?].

Authors:  K Hora; K P Vorderwinkler; V Vécsei; C Gäbler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Indications for implant removal after fracture healing: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D I Vos; M H J Verhofstad
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Surgeons' beliefs and perceptions about removal of orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  Beate Hanson; Chris van der Werken; Dirk Stengel
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Outcome analysis following removal of locking plate fixation of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Volker Braunstein; Sonja Kirchhoff; Christoph M Sprecher; Ben Ockert; Florian Fischer; Bernd A Leidel; Peter Biberthaler
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-10-12       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Metal implant removal: benefits and drawbacks--a patient survey.

Authors:  Georg Reith; Vera Schmitz-Greven; Kai O Hensel; Marco M Schneider; Tibor Tinschmann; Bertil Bouillon; Christian Probst
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Biodegradable magnesium-based screw clinically equivalent to titanium screw in hallux valgus surgery: short term results of the first prospective, randomized, controlled clinical pilot study.

Authors:  Henning Windhagen; Kerstin Radtke; Andreas Weizbauer; Julia Diekmann; Yvonne Noll; Ulrike Kreimeyer; Robert Schavan; Christina Stukenborg-Colsman; Hazibullah Waizy
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 10.  Elective removal vs. retaining of hardware after osteosynthesis in asymptomatic patients-a scoping review.

Authors:  Barbara Prediger; Tim Mathes; Christian Probst; Dawid Pieper
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-10-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.