Literature DB >> 15838521

In my end is my beginning: control of end resection and DSBR pathway 'choice' by cyclin-dependent kinases.

Ralph Scully1, Anyong Xie.   

Abstract

The genome is constantly subjected to chemical alterations that have the potential to cause genetic mutation, chromosomal rearrangements and, in the case of multicellular organisms, cancer. Particular vulnerability exists during DNA replication, when the two DNA strands of a chromosome separate to form templates for the synthesis of sister chromatids. Attempted replication across a damaged or nicked DNA template can result in the formation of a double-strand break (DSB), arguably the most dangerous of DNA lesions. DSBs can also arise directly at any cell cycle stage following exposure to ionizing radiation or radiomimetic agents. To combat these recurrent threats of genomic instability, numerous distinct enzyme systems have evolved that sense DNA damage and coordinate its repair. Part of this coordination involves the activation of signal transduction cascades that target repair proteins, trigger DNA damage-dependent cell cycle checkpoints and profoundly affect chromatin neighboring a DSB. Here, we discuss current models of how lesion processing itself helps to coordinate these signals in dividing cells. Recent evidence in yeast of a role for cyclin-dependent kinases in DNA end resection suggests a possible solution to the long-standing puzzle of how DSBR pathway 'choice' is regulated through the cell cycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15838521      PMCID: PMC2977996          DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   9.867


  42 in total

Review 1.  Dial 9-1-1 for DNA damage: the Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (9-1-1) clamp complex.

Authors:  Edgardo R Parrilla-Castellar; Sonnet J H Arlander; Larry Karnitz
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2004 Aug-Sep

Review 2.  Chk1 in the DNA damage response: conserved roles from yeasts to mammals.

Authors:  Yinhuai Chen; Yolanda Sanchez
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2004 Aug-Sep

Review 3.  Regulation of DNA replication by ATR: signaling in response to DNA intermediates.

Authors:  David Shechter; Vincenzo Costanzo; Jean Gautier
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2004 Aug-Sep

Review 4.  Homologous recombination-mediated double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Claire Wyman; Dejan Ristic; Roland Kanaar
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2004 Aug-Sep

5.  Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins.

Authors:  Michael Lisby; Jacqueline H Barlow; Rebecca C Burgess; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  The minimum amount of homology required for homologous recombination in mammalian cells.

Authors:  J Rubnitz; S Subramani
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  The Mre11 nuclease is not required for 5' to 3' resection at multiple HO-induced double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Bertrand Llorente; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 8.  The Mre11 complex and the metabolism of chromosome breaks: the importance of communicating and holding things together.

Authors:  Travis H Stracker; Jan-Willem F Theunissen; Monica Morales; John H J Petrini
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2004 Aug-Sep

9.  Distribution and dynamics of chromatin modification induced by a defined DNA double-strand break.

Authors:  Robert Shroff; Ayelet Arbel-Eden; Duane Pilch; Grzegorz Ira; William M Bonner; John H Petrini; James E Haber; Michael Lichten
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1.

Authors:  Grzegorz Ira; Achille Pellicioli; Alitukiriza Balijja; Xuan Wang; Simona Fiorani; Walter Carotenuto; Giordano Liberi; Debra Bressan; Lihong Wan; Nancy M Hollingsworth; James E Haber; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Sharpening the ends for repair: mechanisms and regulation of DNA resection.

Authors:  Sharad C Paudyal; Zhongsheng You
Journal:  Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai)       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.848

Review 2.  Cyclin-dependent kinases (cdks) and the DNA damage response: rationale for cdk inhibitor-chemotherapy combinations as an anticancer strategy for solid tumors.

Authors:  Neil Johnson; Geoffrey I Shapiro
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.902

Review 3.  Risky business: Microhomology-mediated end joining.

Authors:  Supriya Sinha; Diana Villarreal; Eun Yong Shim; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2016-01-02       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Loss of MAP3K7 Sensitizes Prostate Cancer Cells to CDK1/2 Inhibition and DNA Damage by Disrupting Homologous Recombination.

Authors:  James C Costello; Scott D Cramer; Satoshi Washino; Leah C Rider; Lina Romero; Lauren K Jillson; Trisiani Affandi; Angela M Ohm; Elaine T Lam; Mary E Reyland
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 6.333

5.  PAXX Participates in Base Excision Repair via Interacting with Pol β and Contributes to TMZ Resistance in Glioma Cells.

Authors:  Ben Yang; Xueqi Fu; Jilong Hao; Jing Sun; Zongzhu Li; Haisong Li; Haiyang Xu
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 3.444

6.  Drosophila brca2 is required for mitotic and meiotic DNA repair and efficient activation of the meiotic recombination checkpoint.

Authors:  Martha Klovstad; Uri Abdu; Trudi Schüpbach
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Human base excision repair complex is physically associated to DNA replication and cell cycle regulatory proteins.

Authors:  Eleonora Parlanti; Giada Locatelli; Giovanni Maga; Eugenia Dogliotti
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Hierarchy of nonhomologous end-joining, single-strand annealing and gene conversion at site-directed DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Wael Y Mansour; Sabine Schumacher; Raphael Rosskopf; Tim Rhein; Filip Schmidt-Petersen; Fruszina Gatzemeier; Friedrich Haag; Kerstin Borgmann; Henning Willers; Jochen Dahm-Daphi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  DNA Damage Responses during the Cell Cycle: Insights from Model Organisms and Beyond.

Authors:  Delisa E Clay; Donald T Fox
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 4.096

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.