Literature DB >> 15837986

Population-based validation of the prognostic model ADJUVANT! for early breast cancer.

Ivo A Olivotto1, Chris D Bajdik, Peter M Ravdin, Caroline H Speers, Andrew J Coldman, Brian D Norris, Greg J Davis, Stephen K Chia, Karen A Gelmon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Adjuvant! (www.adjuvantonline.com) is a web-based tool that predicts 10-year breast cancer outcomes with and without adjuvant systemic therapy, but it has not been independently validated.
METHODS: Using the British Columbia Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit (BCOU) database, demographic, pathologic, staging, and treatment data on 4,083 women diagnosed between 1989 and 1993 in British Columbia with T1-2, N0-1, M0 breast cancer were abstracted and entered into Adjuvant! to calculate predicted 10-year overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and event-free survival (EFS) for each patient. Individual BCOU observed outcomes at 10 years were independently determined. Predicted and observed outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: Across all 4,083 patients, 10-year predicted and observed outcomes were within 1% for OS, BCSS, and EFS (all P > .05). Predicted and observed outcomes were within 2% for most demographic, pathologic, and treatment-defined subgroups. Adjuvant! overestimated OS, BCSS, and EFS in women younger than age 35 years (predicted-observed = 8.6%, 9.6%, and 13.6%, respectively; all P < .001) or with lymphatic or vascular invasion (LVI; predicted-observed = 3.6%, 3.8%, and 4.2%, respectively; all P < .05); these two prognostic factors were not automatically incorporated within the Adjuvant! algorithm. After adjusting for the distribution of LVI, using the prognostic factor impact calculator in Adjuvant!, 10-year predicted and observed outcomes were no longer significantly different.
CONCLUSION: Adjuvant! performed reliably. Patients younger than age 35 or with known additional adverse prognostic factors such as LVI require adjustment of risks to derive reliable predictions of prognosis without adjuvant systemic therapy and the absolute benefits of adjuvant systemic therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15837986     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  164 in total

Review 1.  Breast cancer assessment tools and optimizing adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Catherine Oakman; Libero Santarpia; Angelo Di Leo
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Is Chemoendocrine Treatment without Alternative?

Authors:  Richard Greil
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Node-Negative Breast Cancer: Which Patients Should Be Treated?

Authors:  Marcus Schmidt
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Nomogram Identifies Age as the Most Important Predictor of Overall Survival in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Cancer After Primary Surgery.

Authors:  Supriya Gupta; Jennifer Waller; Jimmy Brown; Yolanda Elam; James V Rawson; Darko Pucar
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-08-16

5.  The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.

Authors:  Angela K Green; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Robert W Corty; Ethan Basch; Mathew I Milowsky; Stacie B Dusetzina; Antonia V Bennett; William A Wood
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-04-15

6.  The Nottingham Prognostic Index: five- and ten-year data for all-cause survival within a screened population.

Authors:  Y Fong; J Evans; D Brook; J Kenkre; P Jarvis; K Gower-Thomas
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 7.  Traditional statistical methods for evaluating prediction models are uninformative as to clinical value: towards a decision analytic framework.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  Large-scale DNA organization is a prognostic marker of breast cancer survival.

Authors:  Martial Guillaud; Qian Ye; Sam Leung; Anita Carraro; Alan Harrison; Malcolm Hayes; Alan Nichol; Mira Keyes
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 9.  Clinical utility of gene-expression signatures in early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Maryann Kwa; Andreas Makris; Francisco J Esteva
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  Emerging gene-based prognostic tools in early breast cancer: First steps to personalised medicine.

Authors:  Umar Wazir; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.