Literature DB >> 15837985

Electrical impedance scanning for the early detection of breast cancer in young women: preliminary results of a multicenter prospective clinical trial.

Alexander Stojadinovic1, Aviram Nissan, Zahava Gallimidi, Sarah Lenington, Wende Logan, Margarita Zuley, Arieh Yeshaya, Mordechai Shimonov, Moshe Melloul, Scott Fields, Tanir Allweis, Ron Ginor, David Gur, Craig D Shriver.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and patient satisfaction with electrical impedance scanning (EIS) for early detection of breast cancer in young women.
METHODS: Women undergoing screening clinical breast examination, imaging, or biopsy were eligible for EIS examination with T-Scan 2000ED (Mirabel Medical Systems, Austin, TX). Multiple logistic regression analysis evaluated the association between clinical variables and EIS performance. Patients completed a screening EIS satisfaction questionnaire (1 = least satisfied to 5 = most satisfied).
RESULTS: Twenty-nine cancers were identified among 1,103 women. Sixty-six percent (19 of 29) of cancers were nonpalpable and 55% (16 of 29) were in women age < or = 50 years. EIS sensitivity and specificity in women younger than 40 years was 50% and 90%, respectively. Exogenous estrogen use (P < .001) and menopausal status (P = .007) correlated significantly with EIS performance. False-positive rates were increased in postmenopausal women and those taking exogenous hormones. No correlation was evident between EIS performance and family history, prior breast cancer, breast density, or palpability. EIS-positive women younger than age 40 were 4.5 times more likely to have breast carcinoma than were women randomly selected from the general population. Patients were highly satisfied with the comfort, speed, and reporting of EIS screening (mean score, 4.8).
CONCLUSION: EIS seems promising for early detection of breast cancer, and identification of young women at increased risk for having the disease at time of screening. Positive EIS-associated breast cancer risk compares favorably with relative risks of conditions commonly used to justify early breast cancer screening. Patients are satisfied with a screening paradigm involving breast EIS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15837985     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  20 in total

1.  A preliminary evaluation of multi-probe resonance-frequency electrical impedance based measurements of the breast.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Dror Lederman; Jules H Sumkin; Margarita L Zuley; Michelle Z Gruss; Linda S Lovy; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 2.  Electrical Impedance Myography and Its Applications in Neuromuscular Disorders.

Authors:  Benjamin Sanchez; Seward B Rutkove
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.620

3.  Endogenous Voltage Potentials and the Microenvironment: Bioelectric Signals that Reveal, Induce and Normalize Cancer.

Authors:  Brook Chernet; Michael Levin
Journal:  J Clin Exp Oncol       Date:  2013

4.  The use of skin surface electropotentials for breast cancer detection--preliminary clinical trial results obtained using the biofield diagnostic system.

Authors:  Subbhuraam Vinitha Sree; E Y K Ng; G Kaw; Rajendra Acharya U; B K Chong
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  A GMM-based breast cancer risk stratification using a resonance-frequency electrical impedance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Dror Lederman; Bin Zheng; Xingwei Wang; Jules H Sumkin; David Gur
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Magnetic-resonance-based electrical properties tomography: a review.

Authors:  Xiaotong Zhang; Jiaen Liu; Bin He
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2014

7.  Development of a Bayesian classifier for breast cancer risk stratification: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Alexander Stojadinovic; Christina Eberhardt; Leonard Henry; John Eberhardt; Eric A Elster; George E Peoples; Aviram Nissan; Craig D Shriver
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2010-03-29

8.  Detection of breast abnormalities using a prototype resonance electrical impedance spectroscopy system: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Margarita L Zuley; Jules H Sumkin; Victor J Catullo; Gordon S Abrams; Grace Y Rathfon; Denise M Chough; Michelle Z Gruss; David Gur
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  Bioelectric controls of cell proliferation: ion channels, membrane voltage and the cell cycle.

Authors:  Douglas J Blackiston; Kelly A McLaughlin; Michael Levin
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  Modern breast cancer detection: a technological review.

Authors:  Adam B Nover; Shami Jagtap; Waqas Anjum; Hakki Yegingil; Wan Y Shih; Wei-Heng Shih; Ari D Brooks
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2009-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.