Literature DB >> 28432222

Low expression of hexokinase-2 is associated with false-negative FDG-positron emission tomography in multiple myeloma.

Leo Rasche1, Edgardo Angtuaco2, James E McDonald2, Amy Buros1, Caleb Stein1, Charlotte Pawlyn3, Sharmilan Thanendrarajan1, Carolina Schinke1, Rohan Samant2, Shmuel Yaccoby1, Brian A Walker1, Joshua Epstein1, Maurizio Zangari1, Frits van Rhee1, Tobias Meissner4, Hartmut Goldschmidt5, Kari Hemminki6,7, Richard Houlston3, Bart Barlogie1, Faith E Davies1, Gareth J Morgan1, Niels Weinhold1.   

Abstract

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with background signal suppression (DWIBS) are 2 powerful functional imaging modalities in the evaluation of malignant plasma cell (PC) disease multiple myeloma (MM). Preliminary observations have suggested that MM patients with extensive disease according to DWIBS may be reported as being disease-free on FDG-PET ("PET false-negative"). The aim of this study was to describe the proportion of PET false-negativity in a representative set of 227 newly diagnosed MM patients with simultaneous assessment of FDG-PET and DWIBS, and to identify tumor-intrinsic features associated with this pattern. We found the incidence of PET false-negativity to be 11%. Neither tumor load-associated parameters, such as degree of bone marrow PC infiltration, nor the PC proliferation rate were associated with this subset. However, the gene coding for hexokinase-2, which catalyzes the first step of glycolysis, was significantly lower expressed in PET false-negative cases (5.3-fold change, P < .001) which provides a mechanistic explanation for this feature. In conclusion, we demonstrate a relevant number of patients with FDG-PET false-negative MM and a strong association between hexokinase-2 expression and this negativity: a finding which may also be relevant for clinical imaging of other hematological cancers.
© 2017 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28432222      PMCID: PMC5501152          DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-03-774422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  21 in total

Review 1.  Progress and promise of FDG-PET imaging for cancer patient management and oncologic drug development.

Authors:  Gary J Kelloff; John M Hoffman; Bruce Johnson; Howard I Scher; Barry A Siegel; Edward Y Cheng; Bruce D Cheson; Joyce O'shaughnessy; Kathryn Z Guyton; David A Mankoff; Lalitha Shankar; Steven M Larson; Caroline C Sigman; Richard L Schilsky; Daniel C Sullivan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Oncogene pathway activation in mammary tumors dictates FDG-PET uptake.

Authors:  James V Alvarez; George K Belka; Tien-Chi Pan; Chien-Chung Chen; Eric Blankemeyer; Abass Alavi; Joel S Karp; Lewis A Chodosh
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  High incidence of chromosome 13 deletion in multiple myeloma detected by multiprobe interphase FISH.

Authors:  J Shaughnessy; E Tian; J Sawyer; K Bumm; R Landes; A Badros; C Morris; G Tricot; J Epstein; B Barlogie
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Twyla B Bartel; Jeff Haessler; Tracy L Y Brown; John D Shaughnessy; Frits van Rhee; Elias Anaissie; Terri Alpe; Edgardo Angtuaco; Ronald Walker; Joshua Epstein; John Crowley; Bart Barlogie
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Challenges and opportunities of novel imaging techniques in monoclonal plasma cell disorders: imaging "early myeloma".

Authors:  Jens Hillengass; Ola Landgren
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2013-01-28

6.  In vivo assessment of glucose metabolism in hepatocellular carcinoma with FDG-PET.

Authors:  T Torizuka; N Tamaki; T Inokuma; Y Magata; S Sasayama; Y Yonekura; A Tanaka; Y Yamaoka; K Yamamoto; J Konishi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Clonal selection and double-hit events involving tumor suppressor genes underlie relapse in myeloma.

Authors:  Niels Weinhold; Cody Ashby; Leo Rasche; Shweta S Chavan; Caleb Stein; Owen W Stephens; Ruslana Tytarenko; Michael A Bauer; Tobias Meissner; Shayu Deshpande; Purvi H Patel; Timea Buzder; Gabor Molnar; Erich A Peterson; Frits van Rhee; Maurizio Zangari; Sharmilan Thanendrarajan; Carolina Schinke; Erming Tian; Joshua Epstein; Bart Barlogie; Faith E Davies; Christoph J Heuck; Brian A Walker; Gareth J Morgan
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  [68Ga]Pentixafor-PET/CT for imaging of chemokine receptor CXCR4 expression in multiple myeloma - Comparison to [18F]FDG and laboratory values.

Authors:  Constantin Lapa; Martin Schreder; Andreas Schirbel; Samuel Samnick; Klaus Martin Kortüm; Ken Herrmann; Saskia Kropf; Herrmann Einsele; Andreas K Buck; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Stefan Knop; Katharina Lückerath
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 11.556

9.  Multiple myeloma risk variant at 7p15.3 creates an IRF4-binding site and interferes with CDCA7L expression.

Authors:  Ni Li; David C Johnson; Niels Weinhold; James B Studd; Giulia Orlando; Fabio Mirabella; Jonathan S Mitchell; Tobias Meissner; Martin Kaiser; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Kari Hemminki; Gareth J Morgan; Richard S Houlston
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI: a new gold standard for assessing disease burden in patients with multiple myeloma?

Authors:  C Pawlyn; L Fowkes; S Otero; J R Jones; K D Boyd; F E Davies; G J Morgan; D J Collins; B Sharma; A Riddell; M F Kaiser; C Messiou
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 11.528

View more
  60 in total

1.  ImmunoPET imaging of multiple myeloma with [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-Nb1053.

Authors:  Cheng Wang; Yumei Chen; Yun Nan Hou; Qiufang Liu; Di Zhang; Haitao Zhao; You Zhang; Shuxian An; Lianghua Li; Jian Hou; Gang Huang; Jianjun Liu; Yong Juan Zhao; Weijun Wei
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Copper 64-labeled daratumumab as a PET/CT imaging tracer for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Enrico Caserta; Junie Chea; Megan Minnix; Erasmus K Poku; Domenico Viola; Steven Vonderfecht; Paul Yazaki; Desiree Crow; Jihane Khalife; James F Sanchez; Joycelynne M Palmer; Susanta Hui; Nadia Carlesso; Jonathan Keats; Young Kim; Ralf Buettner; Guido Marcucci; Steven Rosen; John Shively; David Colcher; Amrita Krishnan; Flavia Pichiorri
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  18F-FDG PET/CT is useful for determining survival outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma classified as stage II and III with the Revised International Staging System.

Authors:  Sung-Hoon Jung; Seong Young Kwon; Jung-Joon Min; Hee-Seung Bom; Seo-Yeon Ahn; Seung-Yeon Jung; Seung-Shin Lee; Moo-Rim Park; Deok-Hwan Yang; Jae-Sook Ahn; Hyeoung-Joon Kim; Je-Jung Lee
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Determination of Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Does It Matter?

Authors:  Shalin Kothari; Jens Hillengass; Philip L McCarthy; Sarah A Holstein
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.952

5.  A proposed index of diffuse bone marrow [18F]-FDG uptake and PET skeletal patterns correlate with myeloma prognostic markers, plasma cell morphology, and response to therapy.

Authors:  A Paschali; E Panagiotidis; T Triantafyllou; V Palaska; K Tsirou; E Verrou; E Υiannaki; D Markala; A Papanikolaou; A Pouli; P Konstantinidou; V Chatzipavlidou; E Terpos; E Katodritou
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-10-25       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  MRI versus 18F-FDG-PET/CT for detecting bone marrow involvement in multiple myeloma: diagnostic performance and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Frédéric E Lecouvet; Dimitar Boyadzhiev; Laurence Collette; Maude Berckmans; Nicolas Michoux; Perrine Triqueneaux; Vassiliki Pasoglou; François Jamar; Marie-Christiane Vekemans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Spatial genomic heterogeneity in multiple myeloma revealed by multi-region sequencing.

Authors:  L Rasche; S S Chavan; O W Stephens; P H Patel; R Tytarenko; C Ashby; M Bauer; C Stein; S Deshpande; C Wardell; T Buzder; G Molnar; M Zangari; F van Rhee; S Thanendrarajan; C Schinke; J Epstein; F E Davies; B A Walker; T Meissner; B Barlogie; G J Morgan; N Weinhold
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Meeting report of the 7th Heidelberg Myeloma Workshop: today and tomorrow.

Authors:  M A Baertsch; R Lutz; M S Raab; N Weinhold; H Goldschmidt
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  The presence of large focal lesions is a strong independent prognostic factor in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Leo Rasche; Edgardo J Angtuaco; Terri L Alpe; Grant H Gershner; James E McDonald; Rohan S Samant; Manoj Kumar; Rudy Van Hemert; Joshua Epstein; Shayu Deshpande; Ruslana Tytarenko; Shmuel Yaccoby; Jens Hillengass; Sharmilan Thanendrarajan; Carolina Schinke; Frits van Rhee; Maurizio Zangari; Brian A Walker; Bart Barlogie; Gareth J Morgan; Faith E Davies; Niels Weinhold
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 10.  Imaging in myeloma with focus on advanced imaging techniques.

Authors:  Tara Barwick; Laure Bretsztajn; Kathryn Wallitt; Dimitri Amiras; Andrea Rockall; Christina Messiou
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.