Literature DB >> 26593010

Enhanced Sampling in Free Energy Calculations: Combining SGLD with the Bennett's Acceptance Ratio and Enveloping Distribution Sampling Methods.

Gerhard König1, Benjamin T Miller1, Stefan Boresch2, Xiongwu Wu1, Bernard R Brooks1.   

Abstract

One of the key requirements for the accurate calculation of free energy differences is proper sampling of conformational space. Especially in biological applications, molecular dynamics simulations are often confronted with rugged energy surfaces and high energy barriers, leading to insufficient sampling and, in turn, poor convergence of the free energy results. In this work, we address this problem by employing enhanced sampling methods. We explore the possibility of using self-guided Langevin dynamics (SGLD) to speed up the exploration process in free energy simulations. To obtain improved free energy differences from such simulations, it is necessary to account for the effects of the bias due to the guiding forces. We demonstrate how this can be accomplished for the Bennett's acceptance ratio (BAR) and the enveloping distribution sampling (EDS) methods. While BAR is considered among the most efficient methods available for free energy calculations, the EDS method developed by Christ and van Gunsteren is a promising development that reduces the computational costs of free energy calculations by simulating a single reference state. To evaluate the accuracy of both approaches in connection with enhanced sampling, EDS was implemented in CHARMM. For testing, we employ benchmark systems with analytical reference results and the mutation of alanine to serine. We find that SGLD with reweighting can provide accurate results for BAR and EDS where conventional molecular dynamics simulations fail. In addition, we compare the performance of EDS with other free energy methods. We briefly discuss the implications of our results and provide practical guidelines for conducting free energy simulations with SGLD.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 26593010      PMCID: PMC6413517          DOI: 10.1021/ct300116r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  39 in total

1.  New analytic approximation to the standard molecular volume definition and its application to generalized Born calculations.

Authors:  Michael S Lee; Michael Feig; Freddie R Salsbury; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Free energies of ligand binding for structurally diverse compounds.

Authors:  Chris Oostenbrink; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Comparison of efficiency and bias of free energies computed by exponential averaging, the Bennett acceptance ratio, and thermodynamic integration.

Authors:  Michael R Shirts; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Alchemical free energy calculations and multiple conformational substates.

Authors:  Martin Leitgeb; Christian Schröder; Stefan Boresch
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Predicting absolute ligand binding free energies to a simple model site.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Alan P Graves; John D Chodera; Andrea C McReynolds; Brian K Shoichet; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Enveloping distribution sampling: a method to calculate free energy differences from a single simulation.

Authors:  Clara D Christ; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Open science grid study of the coupling between conformation and water content in the interior of a protein.

Authors:  Ana Damjanović; Benjamin T Miller; Torre J Wenaus; Petar Maksimović; Bertrand García-Moreno E; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Multiple free energies from a single simulation: extending enveloping distribution sampling to nonoverlapping phase-space distributions.

Authors:  Clara D Christ; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Are current molecular dynamics force fields too helical?

Authors:  Robert B Best; Nicolae-Viorel Buchete; Gerhard Hummer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Backbone relaxation coupled to the ionization of internal groups in proteins: a self-guided Langevin dynamics study.

Authors:  Ana Damjanović; Xiongwu Wu; Bertrand García-Moreno E; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 4.033

View more
  7 in total

1.  On the faithfulness of molecular mechanics representations of proteins towards quantum-mechanical energy surfaces.

Authors:  Gerhard König; Sereina Riniker
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Absolute binding free energy calculations of CBClip host-guest systems in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.

Authors:  Juyong Lee; Florentina Tofoleanu; Frank C Pickard; Gerhard König; Jing Huang; Ana Damjanović; Minkyung Baek; Chaok Seok; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Targeted conformational search with map-restrained self-guided Langevin dynamics: application to flexible fitting into electron microscopic density maps.

Authors:  Xiongwu Wu; Sriram Subramaniam; David A Case; Katherine W Wu; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 2.867

4.  Correcting for the free energy costs of bond or angle constraints in molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Gerhard König; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2014-09-16

5.  Constant pH Molecular Dynamics in Explicit Solvent with Enveloping Distribution Sampling and Hamiltonian Exchange.

Authors:  Juyong Lee; Benjamin T Miller; Ana Damjanović; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Computational scheme for pH-dependent binding free energy calculation with explicit solvent.

Authors:  Juyong Lee; Benjamin T Miller; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Optimizing the Calculation of Free Energy Differences in Nonequilibrium Work SQM/MM Switching Simulations.

Authors:  Andreas Schöller; Fiona Kearns; H Lee Woodcock; Stefan Boresch
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.466

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.