Literature DB >> 15830117

How to appraise a prognostic study.

Kenneth Mak1, Cheng Kiong Kum.   

Abstract

Prognostic studies are studies that examine selected predictive variables or risk factors and assess their influence on the outcome of a disease. They allow clinicians to understand better the natural history of a disease, guide clinical decision-making by facilitating the selection of appropriate treatment options, and allow more accurate prediction of disease outcomes. Appraising prognostic studies involves determining the internal validity of the study design and evaluating the influence of systemic errors or bias. In studies examining multiple prognostic variables, care must be taken to minimize the confounding influence each variable would have on the other parameters. Evaluating the results of appropriate statistical analysis enables conclusions to be made that may influence clinical practice. Care must be taken to ensure that the conditions under which the prognostic study were conducted resemble circumstances in the local institution so as to allow the conclusions to be applied to local practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15830117     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-005-7914-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  15 in total

Review 1.  Trials in surgery.

Authors:  R Lilford; D Braunholtz; J Harris; T Gill
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing.

Authors:  M J Gardner; D G Altman
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-03-15

3.  The timing of biliary surgery in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  J H Ranson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Confidence intervals.

Authors:  C J Bulpitt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-02-28       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Users' guides to the medical literature. V. How to use an article about prognosis. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  A Laupacis; G Wells; W S Richardson; P Tugwell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-07-20       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  APACHE-II score for assessment and monitoring of acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  M Larvin; M J McMahon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-07-22       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Surgical treatment of perforated diverticular disease: evaluation of factors predicting prognosis in the elderly.

Authors:  Adolfo Pisanu; Alessandro Cois; Alessandro Uccheddu
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2004 Jan-Mar

8.  [TAPP versus TEP: a retrospective analysis 5 years after laparoscopic transperitoneal and total endoscopic extraperitoneal repair in inguinal and femoral hernia].

Authors:  A Czechowski; A Schafmayer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  M A Memon; N J Cooper; B Memon; M I Memon; K R Abrams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Risk factors for symptomatic gallstones in patients with liver cirrhosis: a case-control study.

Authors:  Monica Acalovschi; Dan Blendea; Cristina Feier; Alfred I Letia; Nadia Ratiu; Dan L Dumitrascu; Adina Veres
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  7 in total

1.  Letter to the Editor: What Injury Mechanism and Patterns of Ligament Status Are Associated With Isolated Coronoid, Isolated Radial Head, and Combined Fractures?

Authors:  Saurabh Agarwal; Deepak Kumar; Prasoon Kumar; Rajesh Kumar Rajnish
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Association between Functional Performance and Return to Performance in High-Impact Sports after Lower Extremity Injury: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Astrid Vereijken; Inne Aerts; Jorrit Jetten; Bruno Tassignon; Jo Verschueren; Romain Meeusen; Emiel van Trijffel
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Case-only genome-wide interaction study of disease risk, prognosis and treatment.

Authors:  Brandon L Pierce; Habibul Ahsan
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 4.  Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome in Active Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Risk Factors.

Authors:  Mark F Reinking; Tricia M Austin; Randy R Richter; Mary M Krieger
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 3.843

5.  An In-Depth Bibliometric Analysis and Current Perspective on Male infertility Research.

Authors:  Saradha Baskaran; Ashok Agarwal; Kristian Leisegang; Peter Natesan Pushparaj; Manesh Kumar Panner Selvam; Ralf Henkel
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 5.400

6.  Prognosis for patients with chronic low back pain: inception cohort study.

Authors:  Luciola da C Menezes Costa; Christopher G Maher; James H McAuley; Mark J Hancock; Robert D Herbert; Kathryn M Refshauge; Nicholas Henschke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-10-06

7.  Clinical Validity of Subjective Clinical Prognosis in First Episode Psychosis Schizophrenia Patients: An Analysis of Data from the European First Episode Schizophrenia Trial (EUFEST) Study.

Authors:  Valentin Petre Matei; Alexandra Ioana Mihăilescu; Iuliana Raluca Gheorghe; Ruxandra Grigoraş; Andrei Crasan; Alina Roșca; Ovidiu Popa-Velea
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.570

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.