Literature DB >> 14716788

Trials in surgery.

R Lilford1, D Braunholtz, J Harris, T Gill.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trials in surgery pose some special problems. This paper examines these with reference to 10 years of methodological research sponsored by the UK National Health Service Research and Development programme.
METHODS: Solutions to common problems encountered in surgical studies were considered, such as issues of blinding, dependence of results on technical skill and continued evolution of technology.
RESULTS: Numerous methodological developments are described, including the tracker trial concept in which trial design can be adapted to take account of technical developments and interim results. The governance of trials, solutions to ethical conundra and the rising importance of databases are also discussed.
CONCLUSION: Like surgery itself, the methodological toolkit for evaluation of surgical procedures continues to evolve. The rules of statistical and scientific probity provide plenty of scope for imaginative design solutions for surgical trials. Copyright 2003 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14716788     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  24 in total

1.  Practical tips for surgical research: blinding: who, what, when, why, how?

Authors:  Paul J Karanicolas; Forough Farrokhyar; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society--rationale and current status.

Authors:  Hanns-Peter Knaebel; Markus K Diener; Moritz N Wente; Hartwig Bauer; Markus W Büchler; Matthias Rothmund; Christoph M Seiler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Sample size matters: a guide for surgeons.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Daniel Oertli
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  How to appraise a prognostic study.

Authors:  Kenneth Mak; Cheng Kiong Kum
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Could bipolar vessel sealers prevent bile leaks after hepatectomy?

Authors:  Serge Evrard; Yves Bécouarn; René Brunet; Marianne Fonck; Caroline Larrue; Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 6.  The reporting of randomized clinical trials using a surgical intervention is in need of immediate improvement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Isabelle Jacquier; Isabelle Boutron; David Moher; Carine Roy; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Urogynaecological research: current and future developments.

Authors:  Gunnar Lose
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-03-24

8.  Do dietary spices impair the patient-reported outcomes for stapled hemorrhoidopexy? A randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Brij B Agarwal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Surgical outcomes research based on administrative data: inferior or complementary to prospective randomized clinical trials?

Authors:  Ulrich Guller
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  EAES recommendations on methodology of innovation management in endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Edmund A M Neugebauer; Monika Becker; Gerhard F Buess; Alfred Cuschieri; Hans-Peter Dauben; Abe Fingerhut; Karl H Fuchs; Brigitte Habermalz; Leonid Lantsberg; Mario Morino; Stella Reiter-Theil; Gabriela Soskuty; Wolfgang Wayand; Thilo Welsch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.