Literature DB >> 14673537

[TAPP versus TEP: a retrospective analysis 5 years after laparoscopic transperitoneal and total endoscopic extraperitoneal repair in inguinal and femoral hernia].

A Czechowski1, A Schafmayer.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The 5-year results after laparoscopic repair of inguinal and femoral hernias with the TAPP and TEP techniques were analyzed.
METHODS: We examined all patients after inguinal repair with the TAPP or TEP technique for the treatment of inguinal and/or femoral hernias from September 1992 to February 1996 performed by four surgeons at the Lüneburg community hospital (TAPP: 294 patients with 352 hernias, TEP: 278 patients with 324 hernias). The follow-up included a clinical examination, a questionnaire, and an ultrasound examination of the inguinal area.
RESULTS: The follow-up rate was 93.5% after TAPP and 91% after TEP with a median follow-up of 5.7 postoperative years. With a total complication rate of almost 10.2% both methods did not differ. The recurrence rate after TAPP was 2.3% ( re-recurrence rate 6.7%) and 1.5% after TEP ( re-recurrence rate 4.8%). Recurrences occurred on average 45 months after TAPP and 36.6 months after TEP.
CONCLUSION: TAPP and TEP are both safe and efficient. Because of the late occurrence of recurrence we suggest randomized prospective studies over a period of 5-10 postoperative years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14673537     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-003-0738-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  27 in total

1.  [Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty. Evaluation of complications due to transabdominal approach].

Authors:  S Gerber; P A Hämmerli; A Glättli
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  [Operation of inguinal hernia. Classification, choice of procedure, techniques and results].

Authors:  V Schumpelick; C Töns; D Kupczyk-Joeris
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Laparoscopic treatment of recurrent inguinal hernias: experience from 281 operations.

Authors:  J Järhult; C Håkanson; L Akerud
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.719

4.  A comparison of the approaches to laparoscopic herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  B J Ramshaw; J G Tucker; T Conner; E M Mason; T D Duncan; G W Lucas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Transperitoneal or totally extraperitoneal approach in laparoscopic hernia repair: results of 491 consecutive herniorrhaphies.

Authors:  A Kald; B Anderberg; K Smedh; M Karlsson
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1997-04

6.  Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  C Schultz; I Baca; V Götzen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  [Laparoscopic transperitoneal inguinal hernia operation (TAPP)].

Authors:  L Krähenbühl; M Schäfer; M W Büchler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Transabdominal or totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair?

Authors:  R V Cohen; G Alvarez; S Roll; M E Garcia; N Kawahara; C A Schiavon; T D Schaffa; P R Pereira; N F Margarido; A J Rodrigues
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1998-08

9.  Laparoscopic hernia repair. Three-year experience.

Authors:  M S Kavic
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy. Results of a multicenter trial.

Authors:  R J Fitzgibbons; J Camps; D A Cornet; N X Nguyen; B S Litke; R Annibali; G M Salerno
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  9 in total

1.  How to appraise a prognostic study.

Authors:  Kenneth Mak; Cheng Kiong Kum
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Current opinion on laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Theodoros E Pavlidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Clinical usefulness of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair for recurrent inguinal hernia.

Authors:  In Sik Jang; Sang Mok Lee; Joo Hyun Kim; Beum Su Kim; Sung Il Choi
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2011-05-06

4.  Urological complications of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a case series.

Authors:  A Kocot; E W Gerharz; H Riedmiller
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-07-04       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Posterior mesh inguinal hernia repairs: a propensity score matched analysis of laparoscopic and robotic versus open approaches.

Authors:  M Reinhorn; N Fullington; D Agarwal; M A Olson; L Ott; A Canavan; B Pate; M Hubertus; A Urquiza; B Poulose; J Warren
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 2.920

6.  International guidelines for groin hernia management.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  [Optimization of perioperative management in laparoscopic hernioplasty].

Authors:  W Wilhelm; N Vassiliadis; S Röhrig; L H J Eberhart; G Görtz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  Follow-up period of 13 years after endoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernias: a cohort study.

Authors:  Alexandra Brandt-Kerkhof; Marjolein van Mierlo; Niels Schep; Nondo Renken; Laurents Stassen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  TEP versus TAPP: comparison of the perioperative outcome in 17,587 patients with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia.

Authors:  F Köckerling; R Bittner; D A Jacob; L Seidelmann; T Keller; D Adolf; B Kraft; A Kuthe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 4.584

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.